[ Updated Jan. 30, 2022, with a link to new performance tests showing compression speeds across multiple software. ]
Earlier this week Apple released a major update to their MacBook Pro line of laptops. These new computers feature two new Apple silicon chips: the M1 Pro and M1 Max. Instantly, I started getting questions about how to best configure these laptops for video editing. My thoughts apply whether you use Apple Final Cut Pro, Adobe Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve.
NOTE: As of this writing, Avid does not support M1 chips. So if you edit using Media Composer, don’t buy one of these new laptops.
SECOND NOTE: Performance is a squishy thing. Here’s an article that compares the speed of a 2021 M1 MacBook Pro to a 2017 27″ iMac and a 2013 MacBook Pro. The results are surprising and can help you better understand what to expect from your new system.
THIRD NOTE: This article looks at editing performance with 4K media on an M1 MacBook Pro.
Here are my thoughts.
First, these new machines redefine “powerhouse.” In performance, battery life, screen display and portability, they blow the doors off any other laptop in the market. But, compared to the MacBook Air, they are not cheap.
If you have the money, buy the top of the line. But that will set you back more than $6,000, and, in my opinion, even if money were no object, you are spending more than you need to get top-quality performance.
If your budget is really limited, but your need for power is great, even the base model 14″ MacBook Pro can edit video successfully with high-quality. No one watching your videos will be able to tell which system you edited it on.
Spending more money does not buy you greater quality or better effects. It buys you speed. Faster performance saves you time, or, conversely, allows you more time to experiment on the best way to tell your story.
So, assuming you are like most of us to whom money IS important, here’s how to decide how to configure your new laptop keeping a budget in mind.
UPDATE: My 16″ MacBook Pro arrived last week and I ran a series of tests comparing the performance differences between the M1 MacBook Pro, a 2013 MacBook Pro and a 2017 27″ iMac. The results were surprising – the M1 did not win every race! Read it here.
MacBook Pros come in two sizes: 14″ and 16″. Both feature the same chips. Both are immensely powerful. Both are totally capable of video editing.
The decision on which to buy starts with determining which is more important: portability or screen real estate. Final Cut, Premiere or Resolve all feature a complex interface that needs as much room as you can give it. Plus, you still need to see the contents of the video you are editing.
Buying the 14″ laptop provides the maximum of portability, but also means that for serious editing you’ll want to connect at least one external monitor.
With the 16″ laptop the size of the screen means that for many editing tasks you won’t need an external monitor.
Your eyesight may be better than mine, but I have always preferred the larger screen for editing and audio mixing.
Recommendation: 16″ laptop
Like computer size, the decision on how much storage you need also tends to be easy. While the internal SSD in the new MacBook Pros is the fastest I’ve ever read about, and speed is good, the top capacity of 8 TB capacity is not enough for most video projects.
You will ALWAYS need more storage. Always.
My suggestion is to get enough storage for your system to function smoothly, then budget for additional external storage as the need arises.
Recommendation: 1 TB of storage
Both the 14″ and 16″ MacBook Pro can include 16GB, 32GB or 64GB of RAM, depending upon whether the system is configured with an M1 Pro (16GB or 32GB) or M1 Max (32GB or 64GB). However, this memory can’t be upgraded later; you need to decide at point-of-purchase how much memory to get.
In the past, with Intel systems, we were advised to increase RAM as we increased frame size and frame rates. While that is still true, the new unified memory architecture in Apple silicon means that data is not duplicated the way it was in an Intel/AMD CPU/GPU combination.
That file stored in system memory is shared across the CPU, GPU, Apple Neural Engine, etc. This sharing is powerful and memory efficient, but doesn’t necessarily mean that workloads need dramatically less system memory. More system memory also provides a performance benefit, especially if you need to keep multiple demanding apps open at the same time.
If you are regularly editing multicam projects with more than eight cameras, feature films using HDR media or projects that feature lots – meaning thousands – of clips, more memory will make the editing process easier.
If you are regularly editing HD or 4K media shot single camera, or use only a few multicam angles, you won’t need the maximum amount of memory.
Recommendation: 32 GB of RAM
SIDEBAR ON FILE SIZE
Apple points out that these new chips can support editing multiple streams of 8K video in real-time without rendering. While this is amazing, it also obscures the fact that for most large frame editing we should be using proxies, rather than source files. This reduces the load on both computer and storage systems.
NOTE: Rendering is defined as time and storage spent calculating new media based on the changes or effects you have applied to it. If an effect can be displayed in real-time, then no rendering is involved.
On the other hand, many editors are working under very quick turnaround deadlines, and there is a benefit to being able to work at full quality and with lightning speed. Sports, news, gossip or tech editors, for instance, sometimes need to shoot, edit, and deliver in just a few hours.
Just as a reference, a 1/4-size proxy of an 8K video clip is still a 2K image. How likely was it, just a few years ago, that you’d think a 2K image would be “sub-optimal?”
GPU (Graphics Processing Unit)
While Premiere has, traditionally, lagged behind in using the GPU, now all three of the major Mac video editors aggressively use the GPU. In broad strokes, the CPU handles the interface, file handling and things like scaling and positioning clips. The GPU handles everything that changes the look of a pixel. This includes rendering, color grading, many effects and export.
In other words, the GPU is essential to video editing today.
So, how many cores do you need? As usual, that depends. Whether you have 14 cores or 32, the quality of your images does NOT change. What changes is how fast those images are created.
If you are editing effects-heavy projects on tight deadlines, more GPU cores will make a difference because you’ll get work done faster. If you are less deadline-driven you can save money without affecting image quality by getting fewer cores.
NOTE: An additional benefit to having more GPU cores is that effects display in, essentially, real-time. So, if you tend to be impatient, buy more cores.
Recommendation: At least 16 cores.
This is the big question: Which to buy, an M1 Pro or M1 Max? To start, both these chips are amazing and totally capable of video editing.
Both chips support the same number of CPU cores (10), the same size Neural Engine cores (16) for machine learning, but different numbers of GPU cores.
In addition to cores, the M1 Pro adds a new ProRes encoder/decoder, while the M1 Max adds two ProRes encoders/decoders. These hardware accelerators mean that ProRes files play with a significantly reduced need for rendering. Again, this translates into faster editing performance with less time spent rendering.
Both CPUs also include encoder/decoders for H.264 and HEVC; which means the most popular video formats are hardware-accelerated. This speeds export and compression tasks.
NOTE: Here’s an article that compares video compression speeds between Intel and M1 Macs using Apple Compressor, Adobe Media Encoder and ffWorks (ffMPEG – open source software).
There’s been discussion on line – as always – about some of the specs. These laptops use UHS-II in a full-size SD card reader. According to MacRumors, Apple confirms that the SD card reader in the new MacBook Pro models supports up to 250MB/s of data transfer with the latest UHS-II SD cards and up to 90MB/s with UHS-I SD cards.
MacRumors also reports that, like other Macs with Apple silicon, the new MacBook Pro models still do not support external GPUs (eGPUs).
Like the Pro Display XDR, the new MacBook Pro displays have a peak brightness of 500 nits for standard, aka SDR, content, according to Apple. The new MacBook Pro’s advertised 1,600 nits of peak full-screen brightness is for HDR content only. (MacRumors)
Gene M. wrote to ask if he could set up a dual-boot system on the new MacBook Pros, where one of the partitions would run macOS 10.9.5 and FCP 7. The answer is no. Running FCP 7 requires hardware that supports 32-bit software. And 32-bit support was removed from Apple hardware several years ago. The only way to run FCP 7 is on older hardware.
I REALLY like the return of more ports. MagSafe I’m in love with and all my external monitors use HDMI. These laptops use HDMI 2.0, rather than 2.1, which limits the number of external monitors and supported frame rates that can be connected. HDMI 2.0 supports 4K monitors running at 60 fps. (Though Apple says these new laptops can support up to 6K monitors using a Thunderbolt adapter.)
WHAT DO I RECOMMEND?
For folks that want high-performance with access to video editing, but aren’t principally editing:
16″ MacBook Pro
32 GB of RAM
1 TB SSD storage
For folks that want high-performance video editing, while still conserving cash:
16″ MacBook Pro
32 GB of RAM
1 TB SSD storage
For folks that want the best, without breaking the bank:
16″ MacBook Pro
64 GB of RAM
2 TB SSD storage
These systems finally gave me a solid reason to trade in my 2013 MacBook Pro for the latest model. Most of my editing is done on a 27″ iMac, which hasn’t been updated – yet. So, I principally need this laptop for presentations, training and portability. For me, the M1 Pro system was the best choice.
Your needs may be different. Whatever you need, Apple has provided a powerful, portable and state-of-the-art system to meet your needs.
38 Responses to Configure a 2021 M1 MacBook Pro for Video Editing← Older Comments
Good review Larry. I have ordered the 16″ Max 32 2Tb version but have to wait a few more weeks for it to come…
To add to your story: I still use my ‘old late 2013’ 15″ intel Macbookpro for many tasks – they are still going strong. That’s why I buy apple (I have no windows laptop from late 2013 surviving).
So my point is: buy for the future. You don’t know what is around the corner: 8K for sure – 360 video – VR – fcp 10.6 object tracking will get better and better…
That’s why I go MAX and buy for the future (what does that extra $$ cost you on a pro laptop lasting for 10 years of working and how much does regret?)
And with high power mode only on 16” m1 max… turbo!
With no support for an eGPU what options are there for external monitoring with a calibrated monitor?
Lots. First, it supports up to a 4K monitor via the built-in HDMI port, and up to (2) 6K monitors via Thunderbolt. This could mean the Pro xDR monitor, which attaches via Thunderbolt directly, or any monitor using a converter box from Blackmagic Design or AJA.
What’s your thought on this new MBP when replacing a late 2013 Mac Pro 6.1 (12-Core 2,7GHz/64GB). To edit feature films and series (on Premiere Pro), commuting between 2 edit bays.
Any of my two recommended 16″ MacBook Pro models with the M1 Max chip will provide you a serious performance boost.
I don’t have my 2013 Mac Pro any longer for testing, but I used one for years. When I upgraded to a 2015 iMac, the iMac was much faster! These new systems will be more than fine.
I just heard a shoe drop.
Larry – I have a MacBook Pro (16-inch, 2019) with 16gb RAM and a 1TB SSD. Would I realize significant performance increase with the new M1, either Pro or Max. I would likely get the 14″ just for portability. Use an iMac at home.
Thanks so much, Gary
PS – met you a few years back at NAB – attended a session and it was great.
Thanks for writing and good to hear from you again!
Would you see a performance increase? Yes, absolutely. However, the better question is whether that performance increase is enough to justify purchasing the new laptop. And that depends upon the work you want to do with it; which you didn’t describe.
If you are doing “general business work,” meaning Word, Excel, PowerPoint (or their Apple equivalents) you won’t see a big difference because all of these depend upon the speed of your typing, which is far, far slower than any CPU.
If you are doing video or audio editing, yes, you would see a significant performance increase. Here’s an article that details what I saw as I compared a 2013, 2019 and 2021 Mac:
If your primary need is portability, go with the 14″ – the M1 chips are the same, performance is virtually the same, but the form factor is smaller.
My MacBook is really my primary FCX edit machine. I do a lot of editing back and forth from home and office. I really use it as my primary computer in general, but it is definitely the primary edit machine. I went from a MBP 2013 model in late 2019 and have been happy with the current model. But it would be a good time to make a move up, if it is a significant upgrade. Thanks so much for your help.
I want to purchase a 14“ MacBook Pro mainly for video editing
I work with Adobe Premiere Pro and After Effects. And RealSteady in the future to stabilize FPV drone footage.
My rush are in 4K60 with some basic effects like speed Ramps, blur, stabilization, titles, etc…
I’m not Pro, I don’t edit a lot of videos (maybe 6 a year) so I don’t really care about rendering time. But I like things running smoothly when video editing, no drop frames, easy scrubling, no proxies etc
And finally, I expect to keep my MacBook Pro for at least 5 years
Intentionally I don’t tell you which config I’m thinking about
Can you give me your opinion about which config should I get?
Thanks a lot
The new M1 MacBook pros should handle your workflow easily. Premiere doesn’t fully utilize the GPU, yet, so while you can get the M1 Max, it will be a while till Adobe fully utilizes it.
I strongly recommend 32GB of RAM.
I suggest 1TB of storage simply because you’ll always need more and Apple’s storage is desperately expensive. Instead buy high-speed SSD or RAID external storage.
If you need to save money get the M1 Pro. If you get the M1 Max you only need 24 GPU cores.
On the other hand, if money is no object buy whatever you want.
Either way you’ll have a great system.
for some reason I cannot see the 32 Responses to this article.
We are migrating servers and some of the comments have not yet caught up.
Do you have any recommendations for external hubs? I have anywhere from 4-8 external hard drives that I’d love to connect simultaneously. And I’d love to connect to the two 4K monitors I have as well. Also, do you know of a good setup/system for where to put Adobe cache files and such? I’ve always used a desktop PC or Mac for video editing. And it seems like it’s better to put cache files on a hard drive separate from where your project files and video files are.
In your question, you didn’t tell me how your drives connect. Remember, you can daisy-chain up to six Thunderbolt devices to one port. So if you are using Thunderbolt drives, simply connect them in a line. If you are using USB drives, you’ll need a dock. I like the docks provided by OWC and there are a lot to choose from, depending upon your needs.
Two 4K monitors will depend upon what computer and GPU system you have – and most, today, use HTML. Again, OWC can help.
Finally, I prefer to store cache files on my internal drive, while projects and media are stored on external storage. I get the best performance that way.
How have you adjusted the MacBook pro display settings for video and photo to get the best results on how final projects will be seen on other devices even viewed on social media and YouTube?
Since I got my M1 MacBook, I haven’t been doing any significant color work – writing tutorials doesn’t count.
So, I’ve just left it at the default setting: Apple XDR Display (P3-1600 nits). Then, I turned the brightness down 50% because when I’m doing anything except video, the screen is blindingly bright.