[ Updated Jan. 30, 2022, with a link to new performance tests showing compression speeds across multiple software. ]
Earlier this week Apple released a major update to their MacBook Pro line of laptops. These new computers feature two new Apple silicon chips: the M1 Pro and M1 Max. Instantly, I started getting questions about how to best configure these laptops for video editing. My thoughts apply whether you use Apple Final Cut Pro, Adobe Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve.
NOTE: As of this writing, Avid does not support M1 chips. So if you edit using Media Composer, don’t buy one of these new laptops.
SECOND NOTE: Performance is a squishy thing. Here’s an article that compares the speed of a 2021 M1 MacBook Pro to a 2017 27″ iMac and a 2013 MacBook Pro. The results are surprising and can help you better understand what to expect from your new system.
THIRD NOTE: This article looks at editing performance with 4K media on an M1 MacBook Pro.
Here are my thoughts.
First, these new machines redefine “powerhouse.” In performance, battery life, screen display and portability, they blow the doors off any other laptop in the market. But, compared to the MacBook Air, they are not cheap.
If you have the money, buy the top of the line. But that will set you back more than $6,000, and, in my opinion, even if money were no object, you are spending more than you need to get top-quality performance.
If your budget is really limited, but your need for power is great, even the base model 14″ MacBook Pro can edit video successfully with high-quality. No one watching your videos will be able to tell which system you edited it on.
Spending more money does not buy you greater quality or better effects. It buys you speed. Faster performance saves you time, or, conversely, allows you more time to experiment on the best way to tell your story.
So, assuming you are like most of us to whom money IS important, here’s how to decide how to configure your new laptop keeping a budget in mind.
UPDATE: My 16″ MacBook Pro arrived last week and I ran a series of tests comparing the performance differences between the M1 MacBook Pro, a 2013 MacBook Pro and a 2017 27″ iMac. The results were surprising – the M1 did not win every race! Read it here.
MacBook Pros come in two sizes: 14″ and 16″. Both feature the same chips. Both are immensely powerful. Both are totally capable of video editing.
The decision on which to buy starts with determining which is more important: portability or screen real estate. Final Cut, Premiere or Resolve all feature a complex interface that needs as much room as you can give it. Plus, you still need to see the contents of the video you are editing.
Buying the 14″ laptop provides the maximum of portability, but also means that for serious editing you’ll want to connect at least one external monitor.
With the 16″ laptop the size of the screen means that for many editing tasks you won’t need an external monitor.
Your eyesight may be better than mine, but I have always preferred the larger screen for editing and audio mixing.
Recommendation: 16″ laptop
Like computer size, the decision on how much storage you need also tends to be easy. While the internal SSD in the new MacBook Pros is the fastest I’ve ever read about, and speed is good, the top capacity of 8 TB capacity is not enough for most video projects.
You will ALWAYS need more storage. Always.
My suggestion is to get enough storage for your system to function smoothly, then budget for additional external storage as the need arises.
Recommendation: 1 TB of storage
Both the 14″ and 16″ MacBook Pro can include 16GB, 32GB or 64GB of RAM, depending upon whether the system is configured with an M1 Pro (16GB or 32GB) or M1 Max (32GB or 64GB). However, this memory can’t be upgraded later; you need to decide at point-of-purchase how much memory to get.
In the past, with Intel systems, we were advised to increase RAM as we increased frame size and frame rates. While that is still true, the new unified memory architecture in Apple silicon means that data is not duplicated the way it was in an Intel/AMD CPU/GPU combination.
That file stored in system memory is shared across the CPU, GPU, Apple Neural Engine, etc. This sharing is powerful and memory efficient, but doesn’t necessarily mean that workloads need dramatically less system memory. More system memory also provides a performance benefit, especially if you need to keep multiple demanding apps open at the same time.
If you are regularly editing multicam projects with more than eight cameras, feature films using HDR media or projects that feature lots – meaning thousands – of clips, more memory will make the editing process easier.
If you are regularly editing HD or 4K media shot single camera, or use only a few multicam angles, you won’t need the maximum amount of memory.
Recommendation: 32 GB of RAM
SIDEBAR ON FILE SIZE
Apple points out that these new chips can support editing multiple streams of 8K video in real-time without rendering. While this is amazing, it also obscures the fact that for most large frame editing we should be using proxies, rather than source files. This reduces the load on both computer and storage systems.
NOTE: Rendering is defined as time and storage spent calculating new media based on the changes or effects you have applied to it. If an effect can be displayed in real-time, then no rendering is involved.
On the other hand, many editors are working under very quick turnaround deadlines, and there is a benefit to being able to work at full quality and with lightning speed. Sports, news, gossip or tech editors, for instance, sometimes need to shoot, edit, and deliver in just a few hours.
Just as a reference, a 1/4-size proxy of an 8K video clip is still a 2K image. How likely was it, just a few years ago, that you’d think a 2K image would be “sub-optimal?”
GPU (Graphics Processing Unit)
While Premiere has, traditionally, lagged behind in using the GPU, now all three of the major Mac video editors aggressively use the GPU. In broad strokes, the CPU handles the interface, file handling and things like scaling and positioning clips. The GPU handles everything that changes the look of a pixel. This includes rendering, color grading, many effects and export.
In other words, the GPU is essential to video editing today.
So, how many cores do you need? As usual, that depends. Whether you have 14 cores or 32, the quality of your images does NOT change. What changes is how fast those images are created.
If you are editing effects-heavy projects on tight deadlines, more GPU cores will make a difference because you’ll get work done faster. If you are less deadline-driven you can save money without affecting image quality by getting fewer cores.
NOTE: An additional benefit to having more GPU cores is that effects display in, essentially, real-time. So, if you tend to be impatient, buy more cores.
Recommendation: At least 16 cores.
This is the big question: Which to buy, an M1 Pro or M1 Max? To start, both these chips are amazing and totally capable of video editing.
Both chips support the same number of CPU cores (10), the same size Neural Engine cores (16) for machine learning, but different numbers of GPU cores.
In addition to cores, the M1 Pro adds a new ProRes encoder/decoder, while the M1 Max adds two ProRes encoders/decoders. These hardware accelerators mean that ProRes files play with a significantly reduced need for rendering. Again, this translates into faster editing performance with less time spent rendering.
Both CPUs also include encoder/decoders for H.264 and HEVC; which means the most popular video formats are hardware-accelerated. This speeds export and compression tasks.
NOTE: Here’s an article that compares video compression speeds between Intel and M1 Macs using Apple Compressor, Adobe Media Encoder and ffWorks (ffMPEG – open source software).
There’s been discussion on line – as always – about some of the specs. These laptops use UHS-II in a full-size SD card reader. According to MacRumors, Apple confirms that the SD card reader in the new MacBook Pro models supports up to 250MB/s of data transfer with the latest UHS-II SD cards and up to 90MB/s with UHS-I SD cards.
MacRumors also reports that, like other Macs with Apple silicon, the new MacBook Pro models still do not support external GPUs (eGPUs).
Like the Pro Display XDR, the new MacBook Pro displays have a peak brightness of 500 nits for standard, aka SDR, content, according to Apple. The new MacBook Pro’s advertised 1,600 nits of peak full-screen brightness is for HDR content only. (MacRumors)
Gene M. wrote to ask if he could set up a dual-boot system on the new MacBook Pros, where one of the partitions would run macOS 10.9.5 and FCP 7. The answer is no. Running FCP 7 requires hardware that supports 32-bit software. And 32-bit support was removed from Apple hardware several years ago. The only way to run FCP 7 is on older hardware.
I REALLY like the return of more ports. MagSafe I’m in love with and all my external monitors use HDMI. These laptops use HDMI 2.0, rather than 2.1, which limits the number of external monitors and supported frame rates that can be connected. HDMI 2.0 supports 4K monitors running at 60 fps. (Though Apple says these new laptops can support up to 6K monitors using a Thunderbolt adapter.)
WHAT DO I RECOMMEND?
For folks that want high-performance with access to video editing, but aren’t principally editing:
16″ MacBook Pro
32 GB of RAM
1 TB SSD storage
For folks that want high-performance video editing, while still conserving cash:
16″ MacBook Pro
32 GB of RAM
1 TB SSD storage
For folks that want the best, without breaking the bank:
16″ MacBook Pro
64 GB of RAM
2 TB SSD storage
These systems finally gave me a solid reason to trade in my 2013 MacBook Pro for the latest model. Most of my editing is done on a 27″ iMac, which hasn’t been updated – yet. So, I principally need this laptop for presentations, training and portability. For me, the M1 Pro system was the best choice.
Your needs may be different. Whatever you need, Apple has provided a powerful, portable and state-of-the-art system to meet your needs.
38 Responses to Configure a 2021 M1 MacBook Pro for Video EditingNewer Comments →
Great article!! Thanks for the breakdown.
This is really exciting! For editing I use a Mid-2012 MacBook Pro that has been upgraded with SSD and 16GB of RAM. Still, lately editing has been a chore. I’ve been waiting for a MacBook worth spending the money on. This is it! So glad about the SD card reader. Tired of dongles. I feel pretty lucky, we’re buying 7 of the mid-range model for student editing.
It is good to hear from you again! Yes, these new systems should be amazing. The next big trick for Apple is getting them made and delivered fast enough!
As always you have a way of making it clear and easy to sort though, great job!
Thanks for your kind words! I had fun researching this.
I have also ordered a new MacBook Pro.
16″ MacBook Pro
64 GB of RAM
4 TB SSD storage
This is to replace my 2016 model which I will keep for tethering to Capture One as the trade in offered from Apple was abysmal.
Hopefully the new laptop will serve me for another 5 years.
Hanging on to an older computer, running an earlier version of the macOS, is never a bad idea. I hope your new system meets your needs for a long time to come!
Larry your review was confirmation that I was on the right track spec’ing out my new laptop. THANK YOU. Can’t wait to order it!
Happy to help. Enjoy your soon-to-be-new system.
As always thank your a clear and excellent set of recommendations. The display on the new M1 Pro and M1 Max are both 1000 nits maximum sustained brightness and 1600 nits peak brightness for HDR. These are the same as for the Apple Pro XDR display. I presume the new Mac’s display can be set for 500 nits brightness just as my Pro XDR display can, but they are capable of higher (1,000 nits) sustained brightness.
Thanks for your comments. My understanding is that these brightness levels are only when displaying HDR material. Otherwise, the screen defaults to 500 nits. (Then, again, most of the time I find the screen too bright, so I turn it down anyway.)
Finally, something that makes me think it’s time to trade in my 13″ 2010 Macbook Pro 😉
Great article, but could you talk about using the internal SSD vs external SSD’s. These internal SSD’s are super fast, but does the operating system, other apps, media, cache etc. slow them down greatly??
No. Using an SSD does not slow it down, nor does filling it up. Clearly, if multiple applications are accessing it at the same time, it may slow down, but, frankly, this is not something you’d ever notice.
You da man! I was about to push the button on a new system to replace my 2013 – like you – but a few things were holding me back, like the SD slot, ports, mag safe etc. Glad I waited. I will now go with your third choice, the $4000 version. But, I will keep my 2013 with Mojave so I do not have to replace things like Lightroom 6, Filemaker Pro and so on. Maybe eventually but I will have a hard enough time with my old brain using the new system and whatever changes they make to FCPX. Your article makes it all so easy. Thanks again.
Yay! I’m happy to help. If my main editing system was going to be this new laptop, I would probably get the same system – but I’m still addicted to editing on a 27″ iMac. So, I’m holding out hope that Apple updates that in the next few months, because that is where I’ll spend my money for a truly high-end system. My laptop is to cover me on the road and in the classroom.
Nice explanation of your decision process, Larry. Thanks!
Looks like I’ll eventually opt for the Mac Mini or 27″+ iMac version of your $3,000 option.
Larry, is it possible that sometime in the future you might suggest some compatible alternatives for affordable external monitors?
Right now I like the LG series of monitors – I currently own two. Here’s my latest review:
I bought a second one just a few weeks ago, though not the same model. Both are excellent, and not that expensive.
Thanks for the great article. I’m reading this after reading another excellent article of yours from April on the 24″ iMac. I wonder how much has changed since April, or even in the last couple weeks.
It’s time for me to finally update my mid 2012 MacBook Pro. I’m planning on going with either an iMac or one of the new MacBook Pros.
If portability is not a concern, is the iMac the clear winner over the MacBook Pro? Your first article has suggestions for a set up that nicely balances power and price. It comes in under $2000, quite a bit less than the new MacBook Pro configurations.
I am primarily using FCP X (with effects, multi-cam, synched audio), and Motion. I have spent much of the last two years waiting — rendering, capturing, rendering, restarting…
My main concern is speed/performance. Budget is a factor as well, but much of the time on the computer is directly related to my income. I don’t want to be penny-wise and pound-foolish. I also like the idea of having a desktop for the first time in many years, as well as having more ports and maybe fewer hubs. But the specs on the new laptops are hard to ignore.
Does anything come to mind to make this an easier choice? Or do I just have to weigh out the pros and cons to come to a tough decision on my own?
These are good questions.
The core question for you is: how important is portability? The secondary question is: how important is price?
The MacBook Pros have more CPUs, larger and faster GPUs and access to more RAM. In terms of raw performance, the MacBook Pros are the clear leader.
The iMac costs about half of the MacBook Pro and includes a larger monitor.
You mention that you are doing multicam work. The laptops will do a better job. You mention that you are budget conscious, the iMac is the better choice. Keep in mind that Apple has said it will update the 27″ iMac to Apple silicon. I expect that to be the performance leader when it ships. But what I’m hearing internally is that those larger systems are probably six months out.
There’s no perfect system, but, since performance is more important to you than price, I’d go with the laptops with a second, larger monitor.
Thanks so much for the very quick and generous response.
I think I’m going to have to go with the MacBook Pro as performance really is most important. I already have a second larger monitor. I’m thinking about your $3099 recommendation — and maybe modifying it into a 14″ model in order to bring the price down. I might have to adjust a few other parameters but I’ll try to get as close to your recommendations as possible.
Thanks again for all your help!