Future Features in Final Cut Pro X

Posted on by Larry

[ Updated April 18, 2012, to clarify some wording after a second conversation with Apple. ]

I had an on-the-record meeting with Apple this morning in Las Vegas, the day before the start of the 2012 NAB Show — along with a preview of future FCP X features, which I’ll talk about at the end of this blog.

NOTE: We also covered some amazing third-party announcements coming at NAB this year. I’ll have more on that later this week, after the NDA expire at a variety of press conferences later today and tomorrow.

SOME BACKGROUND

When Apple was preparing to launch FCP X, they told me that the new architecture of the software, combined with the flexibility of the Mac App Store would allow for much more rapid updates to the program. However, while the releases were planned well in advance, there is no significance to the alternation of feature (10.0.1 and 10.0.3) with, essentially, bug fix (10.0.2 and 10.0.4) releases. In other words, don’t read too much into this alternating pattern of features and bug fixes. However, do keep in mind that Apple has updated FCP X four times in less than a year since its initial release.

Apple stressed that FCP X is a long-term project and that they are fully committed to it. (In other words, because I asked, there is not a Final Cut Pro 8 waiting in the wings.) Apple views Final Cut X as the future of video editing.

Also, if you look at the features Apple has added since FCP X first released, Apple has almost exclusively focused on adding features for the professional market: Roles, Multicam, broadcast monitoring, etc.

I asked what the benefits were to using the Mac App Store for distribution of updates, and was told that the biggest benefit was that the Mac App Store license allows Apple to deliver both bug fixes and feature updates, unlike Software Update.

NOTE: The benefits of using the Mac App Store for updates to video editors are something I want to learn more about in a future conversation with Apple. I’ll have more to share with you then.

Apple also highlighted the workflow at Leverage which uses FCP X.

* The show shoots on RED in Portland, Oregon.
* Ships hard disks down to LA for editing.
* RED files are transcoded to ProRes Proxy for editing.
* The show is edited in FCP X
* X2Pro (from Marquis Broadcast) converts the files to ProTools for audio sweetening.
* XML exports from FCP X are sent to DaVinci Resolve for color grading
* Final conforming of audio and video is done in FCP X
* Final delivery is a ProRes file.

Apple also said the 10.0.4 update significantly improved broadcast monitoring performance, so they have removed the term “beta” when describing it. I specifically asked if 10.0.4 now has sufficient performance to support multicam monitoring and Apple said “Yes.”

THE GOOD STUFF

Then, Apple shared their plans for Final Cut Pro X features coming later this year (2012). Apple began providing “advanced looks” as part of the roll-out to the launch of FCP X and wanted to continue letting us know what’s coming. (I think this is a great idea, because it helps us plan.)

Here are the bullet points (none of this was demoed):

Audio mixing in FCP X is still weak. I’m looking forward to seeing what the new tools provide.

Dual Viewers is analogous to Source and Record monitors; though Apple stressed that when they implement a feature they try to do it better than it has been done before. A good example of this is their recent multicam addition. This feature would allow us to easily compare two clips.

FCP X has been able to read MXF files (think XDCAM EX), but not the native MXF wrapper that contains them. In the past, it needed to convert MXF to QuickTime. In the future, FCP X won’t need to make this conversion. Apple was quick to stress that this was not a move away from QuickTime, instead it was adding support for a common video format.

While Apple did not provide any details, I interpret “RED camera support” to mean that we would be able to edit R3D files natively, as opposed to editing R3D files as QuickTime proxies.

I asked when Apple would support retaining In and Out (Start / End) markers in clips in the Event Browser. They refused to comment, but stressed that while these were the four features they were announcing, these four would not be the only features released. Retaining Ins and Outs on clips is SO useful, I will continue to bang the drum for Apple to add these.

I asked if Apple would commit to WHEN these features would be available? They politely declined to speculate. (Sigh…)

SUMMARY

It was an interesting meeting. Apple clearly wants it known that FCP X should be considered a professional application, that development is on-going, and that they are listening to comments from users.

I tried to get them to provide hints on upcoming hardware, but no hints were provided.

I also got a sense they are working on another application to join FCP X, Motion, and Compressor. (There are several that would be very useful, we shall have to see what develops. I don’t expect anything announced immediately.)

All-in-all, it is always fun to meet the FCP X team and get a sense of what’s coming. And I wanted to share what I learned with you.

Larry

P.S. For the latest in Final Cut Pro X news, please sign up for my weekly, free newsletter: www.larryjordan.biz/newsletter/


108 Responses to Future Features in Final Cut Pro X

← Older Comments Newer Comments →
  1. Braden says:

    Hank, no production houses in New York or LA us FCP X? Really? You need to do more research. Here’s three companies who have switched and are using FCP X as the editor of choice, enjoy!

    http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/in-action/

  2. David Putman says:

    I agree with Ahmadallah above. It would be much nicer to click a button and enter a new window to do color correction, Motion, audio editing/mixing complete with faders (not to mention compatibility with control surfaces for sound and color), rotoscoping, etc. One application for all of this without dealing with XML unless you wish to send a project out to another house. Kind of like an Avid DS with current upgrades at a Final Cut price point… wait, that’s what Autodesk just gave us with Smoke! Ships in September, three month trail mode beginning in June. Priced at $3,499 and works on iMacs with Thunderbolt drives. Nice to see Apple isn’t the only one thinking radically. Competition will benefit all of us. Can’t wait to see Apple’s response to Smoke!

  3. MrRipple says:

    AVID Media Composer 6 FTW!!!!

  4. Doug Stringham says:

    There are still several very key areas where FCP X falls down. And the biggest, glaring problem is asset management and sharing media in a network environment. We’ve been holding out with FCP 7, and are hoping that Apple gets real in this department very soon. If not, we’ll have to start looking elsewhere.

  5. Lester says:

    There is so much this application can’t do, I can see why Apple lists what it may do sometime in the future. It’s a toy, with people grasping at straws trying to make it function in the professional world. Then there’s the matter of hardware. The tower is an old and creaky behemoth now with no updates on the horizon. Meanwhile companies that do make edit software that does work now (MC 6, Symphony, etc), are getting our business, and we won’t be back. When someone comes to me with resume that has FCPX as their skill set, that resume is filed. Hell hath no fury like an editor scorned.

  6. Jeff says:

    I would like an HTML5+dvd output app. adobe has a flash like output but no HTML5 out. that be nice for demoing and for presentations.

  7. Marcus Moore says:

    @ Lester. I think memories are shorter than you think. I know a lot of people who left AVID in the last 10 years who swore they’d never go back, and are now considering it. I know people who so hated working with Premier Pro as recently as 3-4 years ago that they’d turn down work rather than use it (Including me). But in both cases those companies have stepped up to deliver compelling products to users, and have been getting those people back.

    FCPX is no different. As Apple improves the product, it will find it’s place in the post world expand. If the reports from NAB are any indication, attendance at FCPX sessions shows anything BUT a lack of interest.

    And not to be blunt, but I’ve found that anyone who calls FCPX a “toy”, either hasn’t used it, or hasn’t used it enough. It’s feature set is powerful, it just needs to expand in some key areas.

  8. Caesar Darias says:

    Mike Wallace lives on in Larry Jordan. Good job.

    This is all good news. I’m especially happy about Dual Viewers, MXF and improved audio.

    And thank you so much for asking about missing In and Out points. As I mention in every post, that’s is so highly annoying to me. It hinders my workflow, Apple people! Are you listening to me, Mr. Ubillos? Hello? …Are you there?

    Isn’t it kind of strange that they didn’t answer the I/O question?

    If I was going to start a news channel with field reporters who shoot and edit- a practice that’s becoming widespread- those missing I/O points would be the deal breaker. Otherwise, FCP X and a MacBook Pro are perfect for run and gun shooting and editing.

    Thanks, Larry. Great scoop.

  9. Arty Ross says:

    I was the biggest supporter of FCP for many years…many debates…and I still love it…however I’m with Tom…We have made the switch to other editing systems…I can’t in my heart of hearts put our company at risk anymore…Apple deciding to switch an entire product midstream and to have it so far behind in “pro” quality features was the last straw. We love it but it’s like dating a bad girlfriend…it feels great when you’re with her…but you never feel quite right when you turn your back.

  10. Marc Colemont says:

    Hi Larry,

    Great that you had the chance to share your meeting with Apple.
    Exciting to see that they are back on track for professional editing.

    @Arty. Yes it was a big surprise as to all of us when FCP7 was dropped from the shelves, with the very early release from FCPX as only other option. Apple realized it. So give them a chance.

    @ Apple. Please confirm to us that the Mac Pro will still be a possible hardware option. iMac is NOT the replacement for a serious editing machine

    Marc

← Older Comments Newer Comments →

Leave a Reply to Arty Ross Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Larry Recommends:

FCPX 10.5 Complete

NEW & Updated!

Edit smarter with Larry’s latest training, all available in our store.

Access over 1,900 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!

JOIN NOW

Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and save 10%
on your first purchase.