Configuring An iMac For Video Editing

Posted on by Larry

I bought a new 27″ iMac when they went on sale Friday, specifically for video editing. And, because I’ve had a lot of requests recently, I wanted to tell you what I bought and why.

I bought: 27″ iMac

All versions of Final Cut Pro and Adobe Premiere like large screen sizes. It allows us to see more of the image with more detail. In my case, because this system is exclusively for video and audio editing, the bigger screen was an easy decision.

I also have a second 27″ Apple monitor sitting unused on a shelf that I want to experiment with. I’ve generally found dual monitor displays at client sites to be more trouble than they are worth. But, I’ve never worked with one for a long period of time, so I’m looking forward to seeing how this new setup works.

However, for my webinars, I use a smaller 21″ Mac, because I find software easier to learn when the screen sizes are kept smaller.

I bought: 3.4 GHz, Quad-Core Intel Core i7

CPU speed is important, but it isn’t everything. The speed and connection of your storage play a much bigger role in overall system performance than the CPU. So does the speed of the graphics card.

In the old days, the CPU did all the work. Today, that load is shared between a variety of components. For this reason, I decided to get a fast CPU, but use the money I saved in not buying the fastest CPU to getting faster storage. Especially for multicam work, faster storage provides more benefits than a faster CPU.

Given the speed of today’s processors, just about any CPU is more than fast enough to edit any flavor of HD video.

I bought: 1 TB Fusion drive

I upgraded to the 1 TB Fusion drive. This new technology from Apple combines the speed of SSD (Solid State Drive) with the storage capacity of standard spinning hard disks.

However, the Fusion drive delivers the fastest speeds when it is accessing the same material over and over. This means that it is optimized for the operating system and applications. Since we are constantly changing media, a Fusion drive won’t delvier the same level of performance with our media.

I have long been a fan of storing media to a separate drive, rather than on the boot drive. In the past, this was primarily for performance reasons. Now, the internal drive is faster, but an external drive allows far more storage and flexibility.

I strongly recommend using an external RAID system, connected via USB 3, or Thunderbolt (more on that in a bit), because it will store more than any single internal drive, provided more than enough speed, protect your data using the data redundancy in the RAID, and allow easy upgrading by simply swapping out devices.

For me, the ideal situation is the Fusion drive for the OS, and an external RAID 5 for all media.

I bought: 16 GB RAM

I upgraded to 16 GB of RAM. Both Premiere and FCP will use all the RAM you have available. So will video compression software. 16 GB is a nice balance between performance and price. And, unless you are creating some truly massive edits, you won’t notice enough difference between 16 and 32 GB of RAM to justify the additional cost.

I bought: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

This was a harder decision. Both Premiere CS6 and Final Cut X take advantage of the graphics card. However, in the CS6 release, Adobe only initially supported the graphics cards in the MacBook Pro. (Traditionally, Adobe only supports nVidia cards and all the Apple gear uses ATI.)

Now that the new iMacs include nVidia, I’m hoping (but do NOT know for sure) that Adobe will quickly support the graphics cards in these new Macs. I’ve sent a note off to my friends at Adobe to see what I can learn and will let you know what I find out.

NOTE: Even if Adobe doesn’t support the graphics cards, Premiere Pro CS6 will run perfectly OK using just the CPU. It won’t do as much, or work as fast as when the graphics card is involved, but you can still use Premiere on these new systems.

This isn’t the fastest GPU that’s available, but it is the second fastest. Again, for me, this was a balance between performance and price. Video editing requires a fast overall system, balanced amongst all the major components.

I bought: 1 GB GDDRS

The RAM in a graphics card determines how many elements, for example frames of video, it can store for processing.

3D software and Motion makes extensive use of GPU RAM. However, video editors are using it principally for pixel painting. Since I am an editor more than a motion graphics designer, I don’t need the extra GPU RAM. So, I stayed with the base level of 1 GB.

I bought: Apple Keyboard with Numeric Keypad (wired) and mouse (wired)

Wireless gear is great, until your system starts acting up. At which point, you need a wired keyboard for maintenance. Also, there are a number of very useful keyboard shortcuts in all my applications that take advantage of the keypad.

If I were shooting a television commercial, I’d use a wireless keyboard and mouse because it looks cool on camera. Because I am editing television commercials, I’m using a wired keyboard and mouse because they work great, decrease my stress, allows me to easily do maintenance on my system, and don’t require batteries.

I bought: (um, nothing yet)

Since ProRes 422 is the default video codec of Final Cut Pro X, and a great codec to use for Adobe Premiere, I need storage that is big enough and fast enough to handle this format.

Prores 422 requires about 18 MB/second of data transfer between the computer and storage. Because much of what I shoot is 3-5 camera multicam projects, this means I need to move about 100 MB/second of data.

The problem is that FireWire 800 tops out around 80-85 MB/second. Gigabit Ethernet tops out around 100 MB/second, assuming your switch and server can handle the speeds, and most data switches that cost less than $200 can’t handle that much data over a long period of time.

NOTE: A “switch” is a device that allows multiple computers to connect to the internet or a server by switching data from one device to another. These are made by NetGear, LinkSys, Cisco, and others. A “server” is a computer with a large hard disk or RAID that allows multiple computers to share the same files. Servers can be a simple as a Mac Mini, or as complex as an Avid Isis system.


This means that I need storage that connects via either USB 3, or Thunderbolt. (This is an iMac, which means that plug-in cards are not an option.) Yes, I could buy converter boxes – for example, from Thunderbolt to eSATA, or mini-SAS, but these boxes cost several hundred dollars apiece. If I were integrating existing hardware, this would be an inexpensive way to go. However, I’m buying all new gear.

It is at this point that I’m puzzled about why storage vendors are having such a hard time shipping RAID 5 Thunderbolt-based storage devices. Yes, Promise Technologies is out there, and they recently dropped their prices. But where are the traditional storage vendors? G-Technology and LaCie both offer RAID 0 (which is fast, but provides no data safety in the event one of the hard drives in the unit dies), but no RAID 5. Drobo was way late in shipping their Thunderbolt storage and I haven’t had a chance to look at the shipping product. And, as far as I know, traditional RAID vendors haven’t even announced RAID 5 storage with Thunderbolt connectivity.

It is troubling to me that this new format is taking so long to take shape and appear in quantity in the market. Is this a licensing issue? Technical or integration issues? Are there hidden problems inherent with the Thunderbolt format that are holding things up? I have been inquiring about this for months and have not gotten a clear answer from any vendor.

So, I decided to hold off buying storage until I could do more research. My iMac is still a month away from shipping, so I have some time to figure this out.

I bought: (also, nothing yet)

Long-term data storage, today, means LTO tape. The problem is that all the tape vendors – Cache-A, The Tolis Group, XENDATA – provide solutions much closer to $10,000 than to $2,000.

This is the other big issue in our industry: how do we protect the assets that we shot for 5, 10, 20 years into the future? If you are a major studio, money is no object and there are many solutions. However, if you are an independent producer, or small production company, dollars are hard to come by. There are no good archiving solutions that are reasonably priced.

I spoke with the three founders of Ultrium, the consortium of HP, IBM, and Quantum that invented LTO, about when they expect to provide Thunderbolt-based LTO storage? All three said that they had nothing to announce and the consortium did not have a position on how devices connect to computers.

Again, we could take existing gear – currently costing $7,000 – 9,000 and use Thunderbolt converter boxes to connect it to an iMac, but, this simply takes a unit which is already too expensive and makes it even more unaffordable.

NOTE: The Tolis Group announced yesterday new gear aimed at creative producers. The ArGest line supports both LTO-5 and LTO-6, and the Thunderbolt version, which still requires a converter box, starts at $6,898. (Information about this new product is not yet on their website.)

I’ve said this before and say it again: The LTO vendor that can figure how how to provide a direct-attached LTO drive that works with a Mac and connects directly via Thunderbolt for less than $4,000 is going to make a lot of money.

For now, I REALLY need some way to archive my media. but none of the units out there support either my budget or my computer.


Buying any computer is always a trade-off between dreams, performance, and budget. I’m looking forward to getting my new system. I’m also looking forward to figuring out what I can use for external storage. To me, THAT is the key to successful video editing – storage that is large, fast, secure, and affordable. That, and some way to back it all up.

I’ll keep you informed as I decide what to add for the remaining pieces. As always, feel free to share your opinions.


85 Responses to Configuring An iMac For Video Editing

← Older Comments Newer Comments →
  1. Davide says:

    Excuse me for my bad english, please.
    What about export media video on BR? I’d like see my camera video on BR reader. Tank you

    • Larry says:


      Burning a movie to a Blu-ray Disc on a Mac requires an external Blu-ray Disc burner. Once you have that, you can burn a single movie to Blu-ray using Final Cut Pro 7 or X, burn several movies to a Disc using Roxio Toast, or author a complete Blu-ray title using Adobe Encore.


  2. Euan Williamson says:

    Hi Larry,

    Greetings from Scotland.

    Have you as yet heard any good news ( from your Adobe friends ) about the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and 680MX getting Adobe support for CUDA?

    Thanks Larry.

  3. my Imac 27 won’t boot, even in safe mode. In case I need to buy a new iMac, what would you change in your configuration today?
    I’m thinking going for Drobo 5 as in your review with 3 drives and 60GB SSD. Does the SSD take up one of the slots? what size/make drives recommended for the other two slots? I also need Blu-ray player – rec? And a way to read my g-drives and other portables that have FW800. I need an adapter again recommendation. Many thanks for the advice and recommendations.
    I’m budgeting $6,000 and hope it would hold me 3 to 5 years.

    • Larry says:


      I would go with the configuration outlined here, but up the VRAM to 2 GB. I would use the Drobo for backup, but NOT for editing – it is far too slow. For Blu-ray players, check into Blu-Stor. I have never used one, but they come highly recommended to me.

      And Apple sells a Thunderbolt to FireWire 800 adapter cable that will allow you to attach your FireWire devices to your new iMac. I have one and it works great.


  4. running FCPX and FCP7 and its assorted tie-in Compressor, Motion, STP and 3rd party tools for X & 7. No intention on AVID or other NLE. if that helps. Again thanks .. time is of the essence as of course I have editing projects to do!

  5. Mishi says:

    Hi Larry,

    Since you’ve been using your iMac have you experienced any FCP X editing issues with the Fusion Drive?

    You mentioned getting a Drobo drive for back-up. What brand of external hard drive are you currently using for your media and editing?

    What role will the external Super Drive play in an editing system such as yours? Am I able to author regular DVDs with the Apple drive? Would I be better off with a BluRay burner?

    Do you see any benefit to choosing the 3 TB Fusion Drive instead of the 1 TB Fusion Drive?


    • Larry says:


      I’ve had no problems editing with the iMac. I have a Drobo Elite for backup and it is OK, but slow. Currently, I’m using a G-Technology Thunderbolt RAID for my main production hard drive..

      I use an existing MacPro for all my DVDs, and have not, yet, been asked to create a Blu-ray Disc by a client.

      Personally, I find the 1 TB Fusion drive is adequate, as all my media is stored on the external RAID.


  6. Mishi says:


    Until a decision is made on an external hard drive or Raid could the fusion drive be used as the scratch disc and for media / video storage? Would this present too many problems?

    Has there been any change in thought on reformatting the fusion drive into two separate volumes 1. the SSD and 2. the HDD? Then use the SSD as a boot volume and the HDD for media and/or other data?

    To bring the machine up to 32 gigs of RAM, which brand do you recommend adding to the iMac – Axiom, Crucial or OWC?

    Did you buy the 16 gigs from Apple?

    What type of projects do you edit with your system?

    Thanks for your feedback!

    • Larry says:


      External drives are cheap, even RAIDs are not that expensive. A two-drive Thunderbolt RAID is about $500 and WELL worth the money to store media. Yes, the Fusion drive will work, but a second drive is MUCH better.

      You can’t access the SSD separate from the HD – Apple made them act as a single drive. So partitioning is not an option.

      I used Apple RAM, but next time will consider a third-party. The Mac is VERY particular about what RAM it will allow. I would look at Crucial or OWC.

      Most of my projects run an hour or less. Medium complex video, fairly simple audio.


  7. Emmerich Pendl says:


    thanks for this article – it is very useful. I am not shure, if i schould order my Imac with a 3TB Fusion Drive or a 512GB SSD. I want to edit with FCPX and mainly single cam. If for editing it is not nessesary to have the SSD than i would prefere the 3TB Fusion Drive. I also have the drobo mini to store my data while editing and i am happy whith this. And i am looking for the drobo 5D for more capacity.

    Thanks for your feedback.


    • Larry says:


      I store all my media on external drives and have a 1 TB Fusion internal drive. This gives me all the speed I need, and I’ve only filled 20% of it. If you are using external storage, a 3 TB Fusion is overkill.


  8. Emmerich Pendl says:


    thanks for your quick response.


  9. Chris Dolan says:

    Thanks for being such a great resource for us Editors. Im looking for a recommendation for external video and audio monitoring. In the SD world we did DV through a VTR out to a CRT monitor… Im looking at the BlackMagic Intensity EXtreme breakout device and a 27″ Broadcast Monitor…. or Should I just hook up a second computer monitor through a thunderbolt to HDMI (or DVI) and monitor the audio from the headphone jack to my M-Audio speakers.


    • Larry says:


      I always recommend a separate video monitor, not a computer monitor. And the interface you use depends upon whether you have Thunderbolt or not. If you do, consider the T-Tap from AJA systems. If you have an older MacPro, the BMD Intensity card is a good choice.


  10. Shan says:

    Hi Larry,

    First of all thanks for your wonderful resource and knowledge.

    I’d like to know your opinion on what you think is the better option for an editor between the base entry model new mac pro and a top of the line fully spec’d out 27 inch imac. I do mainly corporate videos and documentaries and work off external drives for media. The price difference when you factor in a monitor still makes the imac around $1000 (Australian) cheaper – from what I have read on the speed tests the imac would be the way to go as I’d have to spend alot on a higher model mac pro to see the benefits or am I completely mistaken on that

    thanks again for your great site

← Older Comments Newer Comments →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Larry Recommends:

FCPX 10.5 Complete

NEW & Updated!

Edit smarter with Larry’s latest training, all available in our store.

Access over 1,900 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!


Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and save 10%
on your first purchase.