Ain't Nothing Like It In the World

Posted on by Larry

UPDATE

David Pogue, New York Times, has written an excellent followup article with Apple’s response to missing features in Final Cut Pro X.

Read it here: http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/23/professional-video-editors-weigh-in-on-final-cut-pro-x/

– – –

Apple released Final Cut Pro X this morning at 5:30 AM LA time. You can read Apple’s announcement here — http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2011/06/21fcp.html

You can visit Apple’s new webpage here: http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/

In three words – speed, power, cutting-edge.

The first time I saw Final Cut Pro X, back in February, this quote from the title of Stephen Ambrose’s book on the transcontinental railroad flashed into my head.

Just as the transcontinental railroad permanently changed 19th century America – in a wide variety of ways – Final Cut Pro X has the same capability.

During the last several months, I’ve had extensive discussions with engineers and product managers at Apple, read virtually all the Help files and, more recently, been running the software itself.

I’m knee-deep in a long newsletter which will provide a lot more detail when it comes out next week (subscribe for your FREE issue here: larryjordan.biz/newsletter), so here, in this blog, I just want to provide a bigger picture approach.

In every conversation I’ve had with Apple, each person stressed: “The easy thing would be to just create an incremental upgrade. But, we felt that while the current version of Final Cut held up well for the last ten years, it wasn’t ready for the next ten. We needed to design something from the ground up to take us into the next ten years.”

With this release, Apple made four significant changes in direction:

* For the first time, two different versions of FCP can coexist on the same system. I’ve been running FCP 7 and FCP X on the same system for months.
* Maxing out performance to take full advantage of current hardware
* Almost exclusive support for tapeless workflows
* Distribution via the App Store

FINAL CUT PRO 7 IS NOT DEAD

To me, this is one of the highlights!

Installing FCP X does not remove FCP 7. So you can take your own sweet time deciding when to make the switch. And, in fact, you can use FCP 7 where it makes sense and FCP X when that is a better choice. For the first time ever, we can have two different versions of FCP on the same system at the same time, without partitioning hard disks and jumping through hoops.

PERFORMANCE

Its no secret that Final Cut Pro took forever to accomplish some tasks. (I have it on good authority that many families were significantly augmented while waiting for the render bar to complete its measured progress.)

Plus, the 4 GB RAM limit caused projects to corrupt, files to mysteriously disappear and spawned a new breed of tech: the Final Cut guru, who, with an apparent laying on of the hands, could bring nearly dead projects back to life. (That last may be a dramatic overstatement, but I like the allusion.)

This new version flies. Whenever Final Cut needs to think, it does so seamlessly, in the background, with a little indicator that tells you how its doing and a complete dashboard for the curious who want to monitor their system.

It allows editing files natively, but prefers to convert them to ProRes – a decision that I agree with, for both performance and image quality reasons.

Once you edit with the magnetic timeline, you’ll never want to go back. And, while the concept of connected clips is a bit weird initially, the benefits these provide are so well-thought out and obvious that I stopped worrying about them after the first couple of days.

Nesting is improved. Audio filters are amazing and first-rate. There is much tighter integration with Motion and Compressor.

There are as many ways to edit in the new version as the old and more ways to trim. Trimming can even be in real-time or slow-motion. Old barriers such as clips in the Browser, still image sizes, clips in a project, and tracks have all fallen away.

The context-sensitive nature of the Viewer window, and the speed it responds, make me completely comfortable editing with only one image window.

The whole system is designed for speed.

And, when it comes to keyboard shortcuts, there are already hundreds in the system and the new process for creating shortcuts is just amazingly powerful – and easy to use.

NOTE: Remind me to mention how much I like the new audio meters – big, fat, large, readable, and adjustable.

SOME OLD FRIENDS DIDN’T MAKE IT
Soundtrack Pro, DVD Studio Pro, and Color are not in this release. (LiveType was discontinued when FCP 7 came out.)

We all have our favorites, but I will miss Soundtrack Pro the most.

HOWEVER, keep in mind that if you own this software now, you’ll still be able to use it with FCP X. But it is no longer available.

DEALING WITH THE IMOVIE MONKEY

Much ink has been wasted and many pixels have died in the flame debate that FCP X is just a larger form of iMovie.

Yes, they share a similar approach to the interface.

Yes, FCP X imports iMovie projects and media. No, it doesn’t import FCP 7 projects. Yes, Apple should figure out a way to provide an FCP 7 translator. It can’t be that hard.

However, think about this for a minute. iMovie has been out for, what, eight years with ZERO ability to upgrade to Final Cut? Doesn’t it make just a little bit of sense to provide an upgrade option for the millions of future editors out there?

Of course it does.

There’s such in increase in power stepping from iMovie – which I’ve never liked – up to FCP X, that it would be like moving from a bike to a motorcycle. Yes, they both have two wheels and a handlebar, but there’s a huge difference in power in the seat!

APPLE IS MOVING TO TAPELESS

If tapeless media is your life, it will take you a week to stop giggling once you fire up FCP X.

However, FCP X has only limited support for tape. Tape ingest is from FireWire-attached devices, and streaming-only, no timecode controlled positioning of ingest or output to tape.

I’m reminded of the hand-wringing that occurred when Apple dropped floppy disks for optical media “back in the day,” now that Apple has decreed that tape is dead.

In this case, though, I side with the “tapists.” Apple controls the eco-system of the Mac. They don’t control the eco-system of Hollywood; then, again, I’m not sure anyone does. I have clients today that are using 3/4″ Umatic cassettes for sound design and music composition, and EDL lists are used daily for conforming major feature films. Both those formats were declared dead AGES ago!

While FCP X can ingest from a Firewire-attached deck, its output options to tape are limited to live streaming.

This lack of support for layback to video tape using RS-422 control protocol with timecode accuracy gives the perception that Apple is not meeting the needs of professional output. It remains to be seen if companies like AJA, Matrox, or Blackmagic Design will step into the breech. If they do, great. If not, this will cause many of us problems.

However, if you are shooting tapeless, this new software is designed for you. Easy ingest, background transcoding, background rendering, background analysis… Very cool. And, best of all, you can stop or cancel a background process at any time.

Plus, if you are someone that likes to organize their files, FCP X supports that. If you HATE organization, FCP X will organize your files for you. Now, we have a choice.

DISTRIBUTION VIA THE APP STORE

This is a real biggie, as Apple explained it to me. Because no physical media is involved (think packages in an Apple Store), Apple can push out updates faster and at much lower cost because they are using the App Store.

In the past, Apple used a 18 month, or so, cycle between updates. Now, Apple is telling me they are hoping to do an update once or twice a year.

This ability to respond faster to the market and deliver economical updates has already born fruit with the new low prices for Final Cut, Motion, and Compressor.

This gives me lots of hope for the future.

MONKEY #2: APPLE DOESN’T CARE ABOUT THE PRO MARKET

Writing software like this is not easy, not fast, and not cheap. Its taken Apple several years, dozens of millions of dollars, and an engineering crew big enough to fill a small cruise ship.

You don’t go to that effort to meet the needs of a market you aren’t interested in.

Apple tells me they are committed to quickly improving this version and building on it. They tell me they are committed to making changes quickly and bringing them to market. They tell me they are interested in hearing our reactions to the software.

I believe them and look forward to them fulfilling their promises.

THINGS I DON’T LIKE

Final Cut Pro X is very impressive, but it isn’t perfect. There are a variety of design decisions that I disagree with – and I’ve shared these many times with Apple.

There’s no multicam support.

The audio capabilities in FCP X are far superior to FCP 7 in terms of technical specs and filters. But a completely unintuitive method for adding audio cross-dissolves and lack of support for track-based audio mixing leaves me fondly missing the power of Soundtrack Pro.

The process of adding an audio cross-fade is dangerous, unintuitive and dumb.

Worse, there’s no native way to export a project to send it to either Soundtrack Pro or ProTools for sound mixing.

I’ve already mentioned there is no native ability to layback to tape using timecode control.

The autosave is great, but what we need is the ability to freeze specific project builds so that the client can review and approve a version and KNOW that if the project is opened in the future that nothing will be changed.

Preferences need to include the ability to use frames, not just hundredths of a second for all timing decisions.

A clip needs to remember the In and the Out when you deselect it.

There needs to be a way to remove a project from the Project List without having to resort to the Finder.

There needs to be a preference setting so that all new projects default to Stereo vs Surround.

There are others, and I’m sure you’ll have your own list.

SHOULD YOU BUY IT?

Look, you and I both know you’re going to buy it regardless of what I say. So here’s my main point. I think that within the next 18 months virtually all of us will be running FCP X and wondering how we lived without it.

It’s that good.

Is it perfect? No.

Whether this is right for you depends upon what you are doing. Here’s a list to help you decide:

* If you are exclusively shooting tapeless and outputting to the web, this product was designed with you in mind. However, some vendors – Sony comes first to mind – need to update their drivers to work with FCP X. Be sure to check the Sony website for updates before moving to FCP X.

* If you are shooting tape and sending XDCAM SR tapes to the network, you should stay with FCP 7 and complain to Apple to add improved support for video-tape output.

* If you are shooting (H)DSLR cameras, you’ll love the automatic transcoding, auto-image correction, and blinding speed built into the new system.

* If you shoot on DV or HDV and export your files for the web, Final Cut Pro X can make your life a lot simpler.

* If you shoot tapeless and distribute your files on DVD, you can use FCP X for your edit, export your footage, compress on Compressor (either old or new) and use DVD Studio Pro to create your DVD.

* If you simply need to burn your project to either DVD or Blu-ray, the new Final Cut makes this easy. If you need to author a DVD, or Blu-ray, you’ll need to use either DVD Studio Pro or Adobe Encore.

* If you are working in iMovie, you should step up to the new version and put some power in your pictures.

* If you are doing projects with complex audio mixes, stay with FCP 7 until Apple gives us improved audio mixing and audio export support.

* If you live for speed and high image quality, you have a new love in your life.

* If you are in the middle of an FCP 7 project, you should stay there. Don’t even think about trying to port your project into the new system. Finish your project. FCP X will be here when you are done.

* If you are responsible for meeting incredibly tight deadlines, stay with your current system. Buy FCP X – learn it. See what you like and what you don’t. Then, as it makes sense to you, roll it into production.

In other words, consider that your job is telling stories with pictures. Final Cut Pro X is another tool in your toolkit that can help you with your story-telling. For some of us, its perfect now. For others, it needs to mature a bit.

But, when the credits roll, it isn’t the power of the tool, its the power of your story that makes people care.

I’ll have much more in my newsletter next week. In the meantime, let me know what you think.

Larry

P.S. I’ve spent the last six weeks creating training for Final Cut Pro X. 88 movies, over eleven hours of in-depth training. All ready, right now, for you to discover the power and capability of this new software. Visit: larryjordan.biz/fcpx


214 Responses to Ain't Nothing Like It In the World

← Older Comments Newer Comments →
  1. Larry says:

    Alex:

    I appreciate the pain you feel. I don’t write the software. I can only help people learn it. FCP X is not ready for your needs. It would decrease everyone’s stress if it were. However, you, not Apple, are responsible for making decisions about your work and career. If there’s anything I can do to help, let me know.

    Larry

  2. Larry says:

    I don’t feel used because I’ve tried to present both my perceptions and what I’ve learned from Apple as fairly and as quickly as I was allowed.

    However, I am disappointed because I think Apple handled this launch very poorly. There was no need to cancel FCP 7 so quickly. There was no need to name the product Final Cut Pro – it could have been called something else and live in harmony with FCP 7 and let the inherent benefits of fCP X sway editors to its side.

    This launch was set up to be polarizing – which is something I have never liked. There is too much screaming in the world – finding a balanced voice is very, very difficult.

    I still believe that most of us will be editing with FCP X in the next 18 months – but the road to get there is now much more rocky than it needs to be.

    Larry

  3. DavidH says:

    Larry, Apple had many naming conventions open to them on this product .. iMovie ’12 would have been extremely apropos and accurate.

    I think the iMovie 11 application is a great product. You can actually make great productions. But this is all centered on a local computer, assuming that you, Larry Jordan, have one account with the Apple Apps store to get this software from and that only you will be working on that movie on your local computer. It is all local, computer centric, and ASSUMES that, of course, all your iMovie resources, including movie, will by DEFAULT be stored on that one MacBook Pro or even MacPro.

    But Apple, by naming this iMovie 12 editor “FINAL CUT PRO X” indicated many falsities, deliberate, thought out, with malice aforesight, LIES had been the core, the very administrative CORE of their intent for this product for the past few years.

    Did it not seem suspicious to the Apple community of professional users that you could not find any heavy duty commercial, television, and Film editors blogging “Hey, fellow Pros, I’ve sworn an oath of secrecy not to reveal the details, but I just got back from a sneak peak at what we have all accomplished in the Studio 4, Final Cut Pro 8 upgrade. Gonna be AWESOME!”

    And, you, Larry, Final Cut Pro INSTRUCTOR, live in the heart of the industry where, evidently, you never educated your ownself on the day to day NECESSITIES of the cutting houses and post houses all around you.

    Your review gave such emphasis to praising an upgraded iMovie editor and very very plainly de-emphasized the most important not just “deal breakers” but INDUSTRY PLATFORM BREAKERS.

    How about that after how many years of waiting that Apple did not deliver a 64-bit Final Cut 8?

    That ON-GOING PROJECTS could not be IMPORTED into this 64 bit application?

    That post houses and creatives in the very industrial area where you yourself reside would not be able to resume the workflow that their CLIENTS expect and have contracted for?

    For Lord’s sakes, Larry, you can get in your car and drive up and down Ventura highway and drop in and learn what the big houses are doing, not just the community colleges!

    It is not about TIPS and shortcuts on the keyboard for professionals who have made such an investment in learning and training and installing FCP, it is about COMPATABILITY and COOPERATION between multiple editors or Colorists or Audio Sweetening or Conforming Editors.

    Larry, where have you been in this arena?

    You have represented yourself as being a fellow Professional in the LA Area.

    Why are you so slow on the uptake to acknowledge that Apple has truly let down the guys who work all around you in the Los Angeles Movie, Television, and Production House industry—just for starters.

    Do you know any of these people? Have you ever ventured deeply into their world to look beyond the keystroke issues?

    In your review you should have gotten the big picture earlier than the rest of us and said “It”s great, but it is NOT Final Cut 8”

  4. David Stacy says:

    Thanks for all your input Larry. I am very disappointed in loosing Color. The program is very deep and versatile, a fantastic tool. I am guessing that it can still be used but no more round tripping to FCP.

    I understand that Apple wants to get their product to market ASAP to start cash rolling in. I am betting a lot of pros are not happy loosing their high end functionality in a trade of for speed.

    What about the functionality of all the plug-ins that work with FCP 7?

  5. Larry says:

    As with the transition from FCP 3 to FCP 4 — and converting from FCScript to FCPlug — the new conversion to FCPlug2 will take a few months. I expect plugins will be back to “normal” in 3-4 months.

    Larry

  6. Jack says:

    Hi Larry
    I was at the FCPUG last night, and first off I want to say that took some balls in the face of all that adversity.

    I’ve already received a refund for FCPX, mainly because there is no deck support. But looking back, I see much larger issues.

    Last night someone mentioned Walter Murch using FCP 3 on Cold Mountain. Well, by coincidence, I worked on the digital intermediate for Cold Mountain. You know how we were able to make it happen smoothly? EDL. Yes, a 30 year-old format. We still use it today, because it’s human readable, and extremely simple.

    Apple doesn’t seem to understand the need for an interchange format, which given they recently created one of the most widely adopted ones (FCPXML), seems bizarre. I was talking to the Adobe guy last night, and even Premiere Pro uses FCPXML as its interchange format. I appreciate that it will be possible for 3rd parties to implement support, but without a de facto standard interchange format, it will be useful. FCPXML was starting to become the “modern” EDL.

    Here’s the problem. Let’s assume switches to digital cameras within the next few years (everyone except Spielberg and Tarantino, at least). How can I recreate anyone’s FCPX offline edit in any sort of online environment. Forget even worrying about a DCinema grade, a 3D movie, or film recording. How can I get a commercial that was cut in FCPX into smoke, without flattening the whole thing into a quicktime?

  7. Jack says:

    Also, is there any chance you will publish that email you read last night on your blog? It’s the closest thing any of us have had to an “official response” from Apple, and I daresay it might reassure some people.

  8. DavidH says:

    Larry, I was looking at Your Inside Source forum at this response from you–

    “Everyone:

    All QuickTime files, from any version, CAN – repeat CAN, be imported into FCP X .

    All my training was done using imported FCP 7, and earlier files.”

    So, Larry, what does IMPORT actually mean?

    Do folders of .mov files, no matter what codec was used to create them in a previous FCP 7 project, actually show up as iMovie resources after IMPORT?

    If a user has terabytes of files, common situation, doesn’t the Final Cut Pro x import function automatically start converting terabytes of files into Pro Res?

    In other words, is the truth actually that you cannot simply USE pre-existing media in its own specific QuickTime specs…for instance, custom file size, and 25 frames per second *European tapeless standard using DVCPRO 25, as an example?

    By IMPORT don’t you really mean “CONVERT”?

    And if that is so, can you specify where such ProRes file duplicates are stored and used, say to another external SATA drive?

    Will Final Cut Pro X HONOR the .mov format as simply what it is , how it was created and stored originally on a FCP 7 project from 2009?

    Thank you for your expertise.

  9. Alvaro Tobar says:

    Found this in Apple’s support “It is strongly recommended that you install Final Cut Pro X, Motion 5, and Compressor 4 on a startup disk that does not have Final Cut Studio (2009) already installed.” Could you elaborate on that? What is the risk of installing without a partition? Thank you.

  10. Tim Garber says:

    In the professional world of broadcast, no tape support is a deal killer in itself, but FCPX has so many deal killers it is laughable.

    No OMF, no XML, no export to Color, heck no Color, no layered Photoshop support, no backward project support, no multicam, from what I have heard no way to reconnect media to another drive, it copies media to local (we have hundreds of TBs on multiple XSANs), you can’t assign audio tracks (I organize my tracks for sweetening – oh wait you can’t sweeten since you can’t output an OMF, XML, or AAF.)

    I think even attaching the word “professional” to FCPX is a stretch. If you are self-contained, work alone using files and FW ingest, complete the project (edit, effects, and sweeten) in the same machine with plenty of internal storage, then FCPX is golden.

    If you work in a professional environment with archival footage coming from various tape formats, cut multicam programming or performances, revisit old projects, share my project with multiple editors, access TBs of footage, need to send the project to a colorist, need to have high-end sweetening added, then FCPX is a joke.

    Those are a ton of conditions NOT met by FCPX. After looking at it I question the premise that this was a ground-up build. Could be true, but rather it looks like a pattern rebuild using iMovie as the pattern.

    We joke about Apple fanboys drinking the coolaid…

← Older Comments Newer Comments →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Larry Recommends:

FCPX 10.5 Complete

NEW & Updated!

Edit smarter with Larry’s latest training, all available in our store.

Access over 1,900 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!

JOIN NOW

Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and save 10%
on your first purchase.