Tom Thornton recently wrote, saying: “I am getting a surprising number of readers of my blog of last Oct on my experience with LUFS metering. About 1100 readers to date. Since I don’t have a ‘fan base’ this topic must have greater [relevance] to the Post community. I thought you may find it a suitable topic to revisit.”
NOTE: Here’s Tom’s original blog.
The world is moving away from Peak levels toward Average levels. Peak levels measure the instant-by-instant level of an audio clip or mix, while Average levels measure the average level of an audio clip or mix over a period of time.
NOTE: Here’s an article that explains this in more detail with illustrations.
Peaks are good for showing transients, but averages are a much better way to determine whether a clip is loud or soft. It is also the best way to make sure two programs that run back to back sound at the same level.
Currently, Final Cut Pro X and Logic Pro X only display peak audio levels, though third-party plug-ins exist that will measure average levels. Premiere Pro and Audition include a Loudness meter that I, personally, find indispensable.
Current loudness standards are based on a document called: “ITU-R BS.1770-4”. It was written by the International Telecommunications Union and Europe, Japan and the US have all created standards that are closely modeled after this document. (In the US, the standard is called: “ATSC A/85”.)
Loudness levels in these standards are measured in LUFS and LKFS. Essentially, one LUFS equals one LKFS equals one dB; what differs are the scales they are measured on.
COMPARING PEAK VS AVERAGE LEVELS
AskAudio had a nice article debunking several audio myths. One answer they had that is relevant to our discussion today stated:
“Peak metering is rapidly becoming unnecessary, and essentially never gave us useful information to begin with. Intersample peaks are not correctly registered by peak-sample meters. For example, a traditional sample-peak meter that displays a max of -0.2 dB could read as high as +3 dB on a true-peak meter.
“…As of this writing [April 17, 2016] Logic X 10.2.2 has integrated True Peak measuring into all of its native meters and it is highly recommended to use true peak measurements from here on out.
“As for RMS — RMS is much more useful for gauging the actual, longer term, levels of a given waveform, but RMS is only a measurement (or display) of signal voltage, so it doesn’t really give us an idea of perceived loudness. Two music tracks measuring the same RMS values may not necessarily have the same perceived loudness because RMS does not take into account the psychoacoustic nature of apparent loudness as heard by the human ear, specifically that low, mid and high frequencies of the same level are not perceived as being the same loudness.
“The Integrated loudness measurement specifically takes into account this aspect of human hearing perception of loudness and adjusts accordingly.”
NOTE: Here’s the full article.
WHERE SHOULD WE SET LEVELS?
As you might expect, there is no one simple answer… sigh – is there ever? However, here’s the Cliff Notes version:
NOTE: Apparently, according to the AskAudio article, iTunes “soundcheck” is leveling audio around -16 LUFS, while YouTube is normalizing levels between -12 and -14 LUFS.
HOW DO WE MEASURE LEVELS
In Final Cut Pro X, the closest we come to measuring LUFS is the Multimeter in RMS view. However, there’s a significant difference between RMS and LUFS, so this should not be considered accurate.
Tom Thornton, in his blog, recommended a Klang Freund unit that worked for him.
There are other meters you can find with a Google search. I don’t have a recommendation because if I need LUFS metering, I use Adobe Audition. For example, all my Digital Production Buzz interviews and programs are mixed to -16 LUFS before posting to the web.
NOTE: From my perspective, it is past time for Apple to support LUFS measurement and the ITU standard natively inside both Logic and Final Cut Pro X. Adobe already has an excellent system for doing so.
In both Premiere and Audition, Adobe licensed the excellent Loudness Radar from TC Electronics. While the Audition version is more flexible in terms of measurement settings, both Premiere and Audition provide an excellent picture of your audio levels over time.
NOTE: Here’s an illustrated tutorial that explains how this works.
HOW DO WE BEST CORRECT OUR LEVELS?
In Final Cut, some of the 3rd-party plug-ins provide options to correct audio levels. Or, you can create a compound clip of your entire project and apply the Limiter filter to bring levels into spec.
In Premiere, I export my project to Audition for mixing before final output.
In Audition, I use the Multiband Compressor filter to adjust levels to meet a -16 LUFS measurement. Just as a suggestion, here are my settings:
In almost all cases, given my recording levels, this creates audio with average levels around -16 LUFS.
As filmmakers and videographers, it is essential to have high-quality audio. If you are creating projects for broadcast, you’ve been working to these standards for a while. However, even if all you are doing is posting to the web, following these settings will enable your audio to sound as good as it can, while still meeting all current standards for loudness.
11 Responses to Why LUFS and LKFS are Essential to Video
Thank, Larry. Your post includes some great in-passing information on top of the average levels core. In particular, in my documentary work peaks definitely don’t cut it. I’ve often wondered why my ears hear different but same-peaked interviews so differently. Your mention of “psychoacoustic” has clued me in!
Peak-metering came to US via the Beatles Invasion, when everyone wanted that “British Sound”.
Sorry…butt, “LUFS” and/or “LKFS” are new-age terms for for what essentially sounds like Bull Excrement.
Most Sound Engineer’s today have long since been hip to both VU & Peak metering…when in doubt…use your ears!
Your ears are always the best judge of the mix, but not of levels. Ears get tired over time. With today’s Q/A systems that broadcast and cable use, along with the legal requirements of the Calm Act, we need to get our levels in line with the law, as well as our ears.
Thank you Larry
Please note that Logic 10.3 is now able to measure and display LUFS with its multimeter. There are two modes displayed (s) short term and (i) integrated
Thanks for the update. I looked for this feature in Logic, but couldn’t find it.
Is there any difference in LUFS levels for Mono & Stereo Track / Or in between -19 to -24 LUFS levels is same for Mono & Stereo pair.
LUFS is a unit of measurement, like a dB. So, no, the value of a LUFS does not change between mono and stereo. However, just as when you measure a clip using dB, if you take a mono clip and convert it to stereo (or stereo and convert it to mono) the levels will not be the same (though the unit of measurement is) because of the Pan Rule in audio.
More in-depth on this important topic.
Woody is a very knowledgeable guy and I’m glad you added his post.
[…] https://larryjordan.com/articles/why-lufs-and-lkfs-are-essential-to-video/ […]
[…] Jordan, L. (2017). Why LUFS and LKFS are Essential to Video. Retrieved from https://larryjordan.com/articles/why-lufs-and-lkfs-are-essential-to-video/ […]