[ Updated Oct. 15, 2023, with a link for Thunderbolt 5. ]
Thunderbolt is an amazingly fast protocol for connecting computers to storage devices. However, even though it has potentially blazing speed, if you don’t understand how it works, you may not be getting the speed you expect.
A MATTER OF PLUMBING
An effective way to think about moving data between storage and a computer is to think about plumbing. Yup. Pipes and water pressure.
Thunderbolt defines the size of the pipe, but it doesn’t determine water pressure. The type of storage hardware and how it is configured determines the water pressure.
NOTE: Um, no. Data is not water, this is an analogy. Your computer is not getting wet.
THUNDERBOLT – The Size of the Pipe
Thunderbolt is the name of a hardware interface, co-developed by Intel and Apple, that connects external devices to a computer. It was first released in 2011. It combines two signals into one cable (or “pipe”): PCIe, for data, and DisplayPort, for monitors. It also has the ability to carry power; though the wattage varies.
Thunderbolt is optimized for rapid transfer of large files, which is why it is so useful for video editing. There are four versions of Thunderbolt, with a fifth version rumored but not announced:
The principle difference between versions 1, 2 and 3 is the size of the pipe they create. (The bandwidth of Thunderbolt 3 and 4 is identical.) However, that pipe is split into two parts: one for data and the other for monitor video.
Illustration of Available Data Rates
| Protocol | Total Speed | Reserved for Video | Maximum for Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunderbolt 1 | 10 Gbps (1.25 GB/s) |
Min. 6 Gbps | ~4 Gbps (~500 MB/s) |
| Thunderbolt 2 | 20 Gbps (2.5 GB/s) |
Min. 8 Gbps | ~12 Gbps (~1250 MB/s) |
| Thunderbolt 3 or 4 | 40 Gbps (5.0 GB/s) |
Min. 8 Gbps | ~32 Gbps (~2600 MB/s) |
NOTES:
The amount of bandwidth required by video is dependent upon the monitor size, bit depth, refresh rate, and the number of monitors connected. It is entirely possible to fill almost all of a Thunderbolt pipe feeding monitors, leaving almost no bandwidth for data.

Monitor Bandwidth Requirements
| Monitor size | Pixel size | Approx. Bandwidth for 1 Monitor (2X for two) |
|---|---|---|
| 2k | 2560 x 1600 | ~8 Gbps |
| 4K | 3840 x 2160 | 14-15 Gbps |
| 5K | 5120 x 2880 | 22 Gbps |
| 6K | 6016 x 3384 | 31 Gbps |
NOTES:
So, as an example, if you are running a 4K monitor at 60 Hz over Thunderbolt 3, the maximum available data bandwidth would be 40 – 15 = 25 Gbps; or roughly 3 GB/s. After decoding this data rate drops to about 2.6 GB/s. Running two 4K monitors over the same Thunderbolt 3 or 4 cable would reduce the maximum data bandwidth to roughly 10 Gbps, or roughly 1 GB/second.

Photo courtesy of Azamat Esenaliev, Pexels.com.
BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE!
To quickly summarize: a large chunk of Thunderbolt bandwidth is devoted to video and is inaccessible for data transfer.
However, Thunderbolt only defines the size of the pipe. Your actual storage devices determine the maximum amount of data (the “water pressure”) that can flow through the pipe each second. Here’s a table that illustrates some of these differences.
Rough Data Transfer Rates for Typical Storage
| Device | Configuration | Data Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spinning hard disk (HDD) | N/A | 125 – 225 MB/s | |
| 2 HDD RAID | RAID 0 | ~350 MB/s | |
| 2 HDD RAID | RAID 1 | ~175 MB/s | |
| 4 HDD RAID | RAID 5 | ~575 MB/s | |
| 4 HDD RAID | RAID 6 | ~350 MB/s | |
| 8 HDD RAID | RAID 5 | ~1,235 MB/s | |
| 8 HDD RAID | RAID 6 | ~1,050 MB/s | |
| — | |||
| SATA SSD | N/A | ~400 MB/s | |
| 2 SATA SSD RAID | RAID 0 | ~800 MB/s | |
| 2 SATA SSD RAID | RAID 1 | ~400 MB/s | |
| 4 SATA SSD RAID | RAID 4 | 1,200 MB/s | |
| — | |||
| NVMe PCIe SSD | N/A | ~2,800 MB/s (limited by Thunderbolt bandwidth) | |
| 2 NVMe PCIe SSD RAID | RAID 0 | ~2,800 MB/s (limited by Thunderbolt bandwidth) | |
| 2 NVMe PCIe SSD RAID | RAID 1 | ~2,500 MB/s |
NOTES:
Another weirdness of storage is that transfering large files is much faster than transferring smaller files. For example, transferring a 10 GB file will come close to matching these maximum speeds. Transferring, say, fifty 1 MB files to an HDD will average about 15 MB/sec.

SUMMARY
Now that our brains have exploded, here are the key takeaways:
Thunderbolt is an amazing protocol and essential to many video workflows. However, it isn’t a magic box. Once you understand what affects the speeds it can transfer data, you can better plan for how to use it.
EXTRA CREDIT
In September, 2023, Intel introduced a new version of Thunderbolt, dubbed “Thunderbolt 5,” that promises an 80 Gbps bandwidth! Here’s a link to learn more.
2,000 Video Training Titles
Edit smarter with Larry Jordan. Available in our store.
Access over 2,000 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!
Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and
save 10%
on your first purchase.
15 Responses to Thunderbolt May Not Be As Fast As You Think
Newer Comments →-
Philip Cutting says:
September 19, 2022 at 2:12 am
-
Larry says:
September 19, 2022 at 4:22 am
-
Lee says:
September 19, 2022 at 5:43 am
-
Larry says:
September 19, 2022 at 6:00 am
-
Al says:
September 19, 2022 at 8:37 am
-
George Henderson says:
September 19, 2022 at 8:50 am
-
Larry Jordan says:
September 19, 2022 at 8:54 am
-
Larry says:
September 19, 2022 at 9:02 am
-
Clayton Moore says:
September 20, 2022 at 9:29 am
-
Larry says:
September 20, 2022 at 9:42 am
Newer Comments →I never knew that! Thanks Larry!
Philip:
Thanks! I remain a huge fan of Thunderbolt – it is optimized for fast transfer of very large files and works great for editing. But there is a lot more to it when you look below the marketing hype of “FAST!”.
Also, while USB-C is fast, it’s optimized for transferring smaller files. This is not to say USB-C is bad. It isn’t. But it isn’t the same as Thunderbolt.
Larry
Good summary Larry!
One other effect with Thunderbolt is the channels. Just because there are multiple Thunderbolt (USB-C) ports doesno’t mean each runs separately. One thing to be aware of is ovverloading the Thuderbolt ports. The computer (oh, say a Mac Studio with M! Max has 4 Thuderbolt ports on the back. If you check the System report, there are 4 Thunderbolt independent buses. Each operating separate PCIe bus interfaces. BUT, if you attach a device, say an OWC Gemini (2 disk Thunderbolt 3 RAID) ti has 2 ports for daisychaining. But ony 1 bus so daisychaining adds load but not independently running busses so all bandwidth is subtracted (the water pressure has too many holes in the pipe).
It’s another factor in optimizing your usage of Thunderbolt.
Lee:
Good point. If you daisy-chain multiple devices, say Thunderbolt 3, they SHARE the 40 Gbps pipe between all connected devices.
If you have a Mac Studio and plug two devices each into their own port on the back of the Mac Studio, each device has the full bandwidth of Thunderbolt 4 available to it.
Larry
Hi Larry – I bet you have done this before, but in terms of best practices; I would love to see an article on optimum placement of project file (main internal drive vs external), file output/render, and video assets.
If you have the ability to segregate ea component, what is ideal?
Thanks Larry, this was incredibly informative!
So much I didn’t know I needed to know about Thunderbolt.
George:
I’m glad you liked it.
Yeah, I always learn something when I write these tutorials. My initial thought is: “Let’s write something simple about ‘x’.” Only to discover that “x” isn’t simple at all.
We all learn.
Larry
Al:
It depends… Optimium is defined by the size of your project. Most of the time, media files are too big to fit on the internal drive, so I recommend they be stored externally.
Cache files can be stored on the internal drive – unless you are doing a super-long film, in which case you won’t have room.
If your project is small and media limited, you can store everything to the internal drive for editing, then move it to external storage for archiving. If not, keep everything on an external drive.
Larry
Very good and very useful!
Clayton:
Thanks! Like many things that seem simple on the surface, there’s a lot of intriguing details once you dig into it.
Larry