[Updated March 20, 2022, with additional thoughts a week after release, including the new Apple Studio Display monitor and additional ways to spend more money effectively.]
This is a tale about want versus need. About lust masquerading as practicality. About the extremes of human desire. This is a story about… the new Mac Studio.
Holy smokes! Of course every video editor wants one – what’s not to like? Well, except for paying for it… or configuring it… or wondering what’s coming in the future.
Let me see if I can help.
Let’s not lose sight of the obvious. The Mac Studio does not enable us to edit video on a computer. That’s a task we’ve accomplished successfully for more than 20 years. The Mac Studio enables us to edit faster. Faster saves time. Faster allows more experimentation. Faster is, generally, better. But the Mac Studio does not unleash new levels of quality, only performance.
Only. But that’s still a lot.
Last week, the M1 Max was the definition of mind-bending performance. This week, it’s dog food. The M1 Ultra is now the steaming, screaming pinnacle of mind-bending performance.
Until the Mac Pro shows up. At which point, we’ll wonder why we ever got excited about the M1 Ultra. Apple is always developing new chips and there will always be something faster in the future. Always.
I still want a Mac Studio.
DETERMINE WHAT YOU NEED
If all you need to edit is HD video, even HD multicam, any computer released in the last five years has the performance you need. Recent computers include hardware acceleration for H.264 which seriously speeds working in this format. They also include more capable GPUs, which is required for faster renders and exports. If this describes you, then you don’t need a Mac Studio to do your work. However, that doesn’t mean you don’t want one.
The Mac Studio is designed for heavy-duty power users. I’m not saying “pros,” because even amateurs and hobbyists can appreciate and use a powerful system. But, this is not for “consumers,” it’s for “creators.”
If you are editing 4K media on a regular basis, editing multicam projects with 10 or more cameras, editing frame sizes larger than 4K, working extensively with RAW or Log media, or have deadlines that begin with the word “Yesterday,” you can benefit from the Mac Studio.
Plus, it’s safe to say that the inherent power of the Mac Studio helps protect against the inevitable growth in frame sizes and complex codecs. While converting media to new codecs will continue migrating to the Cloud and distribution platforms, the need to manipulate video formats in a timely basis will continue.
NOTE: We can all benefit from the Mac Studio. I’m looking at this from the perspective of need and budget. If you have the money – buy one. In fact, buy two and send one to me.
A SIDEBAR ON PORTS
I want to congratulate Apple on releasing a pro system that has more than two ports. I LOVE the inclusion of 10G Ethernet on its own port, HDMI on its own port, two USB – A connectors on their own ports. A UHS-II SD card reader on the front. PLUS six USB-C/Thunderbolt ports. And a real honest to goodness power cable, not a brick!!
This is SUCH A WELCOME CHANGE! Yay, Apple!
I’m also grateful that it isn’t the thickness of a sheet of paper. Power has a price – and that price is enclosures large enough to hold the ports, heat sinks and chips we need to get our work done. Thank you, again, Apple.
THE KEY DIFFERENTIATOR
What Apple is saying with the Mac Studio is that the pro user needs a different type of computer than a consumer. More speed, more ports, more capability. A computer that is part of a larger system of monitors and peripherals. Not because we necessarily need all these features right now, but that any computer we buy today we expect to use productively for 4-8 years. That requires front-loading the hardware to last the distance. These are computers we use as the foundation for earning a living.
SO, WHAT DO WE GET?
We need to consider three types of customers:
Here’s what I recommend.
Video editing requires RAM, but not massive amounts of it. The reason is that regardless of how much RAM you have, video files are bigger. For this reason, video editing software grabs media files from storage as needed during playback. It never needs to load an entire media clip into RAM before starting playback. Yes, where possible, files are cached in leftover RAM, but spending money for more RAM than you need would be better spent on high-speed external storage.
Minimum: 32 GB
Maximum: 64 GB
The CPU manages media, importing, editing, timeline playback and Transform effects. Essentially everything that treats a clip as a unit. The GPU changes pixels. So it is involved in rendering, effects, color adjustments, and export. While more GPUs make rendering faster, there’s a point where the increase in speed doesn’t really matter, the difference in actual time is not meaningful. It will take you more time to think about the next shot, or review the trim, or decide whether the effect looks “good,” than the computer does to render.
Minimum: 32 (though, truthfully, 24 is perfectly OK)
The key to successful video editing is not the computer but the speed and capacity of your storage. Regardless of how much storage you have on your system, you will always need more. I don’t even edit full time and I have 150 TB of storage in my office! That’s a stupidly large amount of data. Internal storage should be used for the OS, apps, work files and the files you need to live your life. Media should live externally. Especially because this isn’t a portable system like a laptop.
How much storage you need depends upon your budget. While you can buy more, you don’t need more, you just want more.
Minimum: 1 TB
Recommendation: 2 TB
A SIDEBAR ON STORAGE
In thinking about this further since I first wrote this, I should clarify something. There is nothing wrong with storing a project and media on your internal drive – especially if it is on the smaller side – and editing it. The speed of the internal drive is blindingly fast. Your software will hum, editing will go fine and you will be happy.
But using the internal drive for longer term storage is wasting a precious resource. Media files are SO large, and we often need to store them for such a long time, that spending extra money to buy a larger SSD, instead of investing in less expensive external storage, is spending money in the wrong place.
If you still need editing speed, an external, ThunderBolt 3 or 4 RAID filled with SSDs will be a performance monster and, in all likelihood, cost less than adding internal storage to the Mac.
The M1 Max is not one bit slower this week than last week, when we were all salivating over it. If money is limited, the M1 Max will do you proud.
The M1 Ultra converts two USB-C to Thunderbolt ports, adds a bit more of everything and includes bragging rights. (Never ignore bragging rights.)
Tight budget – Performance that doesn’t break the bank
M1 Max – 32 core GPU
32 GB RAM
1 TB storage
NOTE: If you want to spend a bit more, without stepping up to the higher-priced M1 Ultra, consider adding more RAM ($400) first, then a 2 TB SSD ($400). Getting both brings the price to $3,199.
Performance-focused but still on a budget
M1 Ultra – 48-core GPU
64 GB RAM
2 TB Storage
Performance, without being stupid about money
M1 Ultra – 48 core GPU
64 GB RAM
4 TB storage
NOTE: You can add more GPUs, ($1,000), more RAM ($800), or an 8 TB SSD ($2,200), but you won’t see any video editing speed improvements worth the money.
With all these systems, you can spend more, but I don’t think you’ll see an increase in performance. Keep in mind that you still need to purchase a monitor, keyboard, and mouse (or other pointing device).
NOTE: Currently the Apple Studio Display is getting generally poor reviews. I would hold off buying one until Apple fixes some pretty signifiant bugs.
This last week, rumors abounded about the future of the 27″ iMac. Yes, Apple removed it from the Mac Store. But, aside from that, Apple has said nothing official. Keep in mind that rumors are not shipping product. And even if the rumors are true, Apple can change its mind. When making any buying decision, make it on the basis of your needs and what’s available. Never make a decision based on a rumor. In spite of all the post-event spin, no one knew the Mac Studio, M1 Ultra, or the Studio Display – was coming ahead of time. Rumors all thought these were something else.
WHAT WOULD LARRY DO?
If I were buying a computer now – and I’m not for reasons I’ll explain in the next paragraph – I’d buy the middle system. My next computer is one that I need to use for the next 8-10 years. This meets that bill. I don’t need more GPUs or more RAM because the limit to editing speed is no longer my computer, but how fast I can think, type, and preview. All that extra computing power won’t help me make a better decision. It just allows me to execute that decision faster.
However, extremely tempting as the Mac Studio is today – and I really do like what I read about it – I’m waiting. WWDC, in June, is where Apple pitches its professional products alongside its annual OS update. During their event this week, Apple teased that they have one more system to go – the Mac Pro. The perfect time to launch it is WWDC. It may not ship then, but after the keynote we’ll have a better sense of where the Mac Studio fits into Apple’s future. As well, we’ll have a better idea of its real-world performance, availability, discounts… and delivery times will have improved.
So, I’m reading, and watching and budgeting. But not buying until after Apple finishes their announcements at WWDC. Then, I look forward to spending my money.
41 Responses to Configure a New Mac Studio for Video Editing [u]← Older Comments
As someone who is currently treading water with a 2017 27″ iMac, at upgrade time I will have to include a monitor in that budget which jacks the base price to $4K+ if I select the Studio Display. Can I use the iMac I have as a monitor, or is it advisable to get a dedicated new monitor? Thanks, Larry.
No. However second monitors from companies other than Apple are much more affordable. I bought a 4K LG monitor at Best Buy for around $350. The new Studio Display is lovely, but there are very good, less expensive options.
There was an interesting article in Macworld about an intrepid YouTuber made his own 5K Studio Display from an old iMac for about $870.
Larry, I bought a 27” iMac 2 yrs ago to replace my mbp and love it. So now I need a laptop for use on the road (not a heavy traveler). All of my scenes are either drone shots requiring stabilization in post to get really smooth movement, and interviews or bRoll all requiring color grading. Everything shot in prores 4.2.2 10 bit 4k or 5k. What mbp processor graphics combo would you recommend? Would like this to last me 5-6 yrs so I assume eventually I will be shooting 8 k
This is not hard video to edit. Either the 14″ or 16″ with an M1 Pro processor can easily handle this. You can get the M1 Max, but you don’t need the M1 Max. While 16 GB RAM is fine, I’d step up to 32 GB, simply because you can’t upgrade it later.
Thanks so much Larry! Now I just have to decide light weight vs screen size
I own the 16” and don’t find it particularly heavy to transport.
Larry, this article is very insightful and extremely helpful. Thank you!
I’m glad you liked it. I enjoyed writing it.
I have heard that the 4 TB and the 8 TB are a certain amount faster than the SSDs of lesser bubbles.
I have not heard that, which is not saying your wrong.
However, the speeds these SSDs run is SO fast that the differences in speed, if any, is not worth the extreme difference in price.
Thanks for the comments on the new Studio.
There’s an article on the M1 Ultra at
Key paragraph is,
“Apple took a somewhat blunt approach for the M1 Ultra, simply tying together two M1 Max (24 GPU core) processors and chipsets via a 2.5TB/sec direct connection, branded “UltraFusion,” rather than having to traverse the slower system bus. That gives it two of everything, such as two Thunderbolt controllers and two memory controllers. That’s why the Mac Studio with the M1 Ultra has more Thunderbolt ports and can accommodate twice the memory of its M1 Max-based counterpart. It’s basically a dual-processor system.”
Based on what I’m reading, I think the phrase “somewhat blunt” is a bit misleading. There are two ways to create an interprocess layer. Apple picked the one that was more reliable.
Thanks for sharing your insights, Larry.
The price gap between $2,399 and $4,399 is quite wide. What would you recommend as a “step-up” Mac Studio with an M1 Max processor and a price between those two?
The big difference is the processor. But, if you want to spend more money on the M1 Max system – which is really lovely, by the way – I’d add either a bigger SSD ($400) or more RAM ($400).
I’d probably go with the RAM first.
I may be missing the boat, but the Mac Studio actually seems like the missing Mac mini upgrade that all have been looking for, but with a different name and no “colors” as all the rumors like to add.
The Mac studio is basically a much enhanced Mac Mini with a new name, but with the same concept – BYOKaM – oh yes, the replacement for the Intel version of the Mac Mini.
Smile… your comment is similar to saying that the iPad is basically an iPhone. Yes, in the sense of form and,, no, in the sense of capability. While both are gray, square boxes without a monitor or keyboard, they are not similar in terms of what they can do.
Can I add memory and additional storage later for the Studios?
No. RAM is actually part of the CPU, not separate chips. So expansion is not possible.
Storage, that’s a question. Apple says the Studio can’t be upgraded by consumers. However, recent tear-downs show that the SSDs used for storage are socketed, not soldered. So an after-market upgrade may be possible. At this point, however, assume that it can’t be upgraded.
Thank you Larry. I have always been busy creating as a filmmaker and never slowing up to comprehend the workhorse to edit. But I feel I went to Princeton for the Basic 101 MAC Pro class. Thanks again.
Thanks for writing. Happy to help.