[ Update: On March 19, 2019, Apple released updates to both 21.5″ and 27″ iMacs. These new systems feature improved CPU and GPU options, though the display and storage remain the same as earlier versions. I’ve reflected these new options in my recommendations below. ]
At their WWDC, in June, 2017, Apple announced and released new iMac computers, designed to meet the needs of professionals. These new systems sport a variety of very exciting features. However, if you are on a budget, how do you determine where to spend your money?
This article is designed to help you make more informed choices when you don’t have a lot of money to spend.
NOTE: I have not purchased any of these systems. My recommendations are based on past experience, current system specs and talking with informed individuals.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
If money is no object, buy the top of the line iMac. It will work great and you’ll have bragging rights over all the other systems.
But, if money IS an object, then you need to make trade-offs, balancing the performance you need with the money you have. However, you don’t need to spend a fortune to get a system today that can meet your editing needs for the next several years.
ALSO: Here are two other configuration articles you may find useful:
YES, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE IMAC PRO?

Holy smokes! What a system.
This review covers the iMac. Click here to read about the iMac Pro.
YES, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE MAC PRO?
Given the latest iMac releases, there are very, very few reasons to purchase a Mac Pro right now; especially given its price. Keep in mind, however, that Apple has already announced they are working on a new, top-of-the-line Mac Pro which will ship sometime in 2019.
Given what Apple has announced for the iMac Pro, however, that upcoming Mac Pro will need to be a true screamer to compete. I’m looking forward to seeing what Apple creates – but, as I mentioned earlier, I still need to pay my bills today.
And that leads us directly to the latest updates to the iMac.
WHAT SIZE SCREEN?

Both Final Cut Pro X and Premiere interfaces work best on larger screens. This is not to say they work poorly on smaller screens, but both of these display a LOT of elements on screen. More screen room is MUCH better.
I recommend a 27″ display. Plus, all the new 27″ iMacs now share the same 5K Retina Display.
NOTE: One of my iMacs is an older 5K iMac. I’ve discovered, that while seeing a 5K image is nice, the on-screen text is often very hard to read. So I’ve lowered the screen resolution using System Preferences to make the text larger. I prefer to easily read the text to seeing every pixel in my image.
However, if the purpose of the new system is video compression, you don’t need the bigger screen size. In which case, you can save money and improve performance with a 21″ system.
NOTE: Both H.264 and the up-coming H.265 video codecs are hardware-accelerated in all the new hardware. While this won’t help when transcoding into ProRes, hardware-acceleration will significantly speed compressing files for the web.
WHAT SPEED CPU?
UPDATE Intel’s latest 8th-gen and 9th-gen Core processors, including up to a 3.2GHz six-core 8th-gen Core i7 with Turbo Boost up to 4.6GHz for the 21.5-inch 4K iMac and up to a 3.6GHz eight-core 9th-gen Core i9 with Turbo Boost up to 5.0GHz for the 27-inch 5K iMac.
While CPU speed is important, it is not critical for video editing; remember, iMacs that were current as recently as last month, were easily able to edit almost all forms of SD, HD, and 4K media.
Any of the processors in any of the new iMacs will be fine for video or audio editing.
UPDATE: The choice in the 21.5″ iMac is between i5 and i7. The i7 is worth the money because of its support for multi-threading. The choice in the 27″ iMac is harder: between i5 and i9, because it’s a $500 differential. Unlike the i5, the i9 supports multithreading. If you are doing multicam, 4K or HDR editing, or lots of video compression, the i9 is worth the money.
HOW MUCH STORAGE?

I really like that Apple has put Fusion drives into all but two of their iMacs. I own two iMacs with Fusion drives and I remain very impressed with these systems. They are an excellent balance between the speed of an SSD with the storage capacity of spinning media.
Keep in mind that the SSD portion of a Fusion drive is only a part of the total storage. For example, the 1 TB Fusion uses a 32 GB SSD, while the 2 and 3 TB Fusion drives use a 128 GB SSD. The OS watches what you do and moves files onto the SSD based upon what you are using most. Which means that a Fusion drive works fastest with files you access over and over.
NOTE: Here is an updated article on storage speeds and media requirements that explains the load your storage system needs to carry.
If you want maximum performance AND you plan to store media on an external drive, get the 512 GB SSD. All the files in macOS will take less than 30 GB, leaving plenty of room for working files and immediate storage.
If you want an excellent balance between performance, price and capacity, stay with the 1 TB Fusion drive. Again, store media externally.
If you don’t plan to purchase external storage – and you will, you just don’t know it yet – get the 3 TB Fusion drive. (An extra TB for $100 makes this a better value than the 2 TB Fusion drive.)
One of my systems has a 3 TB Fusion drive. Currently, I’m using 600 GB of it. The rest is sitting around idle. When using external storage, you really don’t need lots of internal storage.
If you just want maximum performance from your storage, get the 1 TB SSD. It’s pricey, but it’s speed will make you giggle.
Apple notes: “For the best performance, iMac systems with 32GB or more of memory should be configured with a 2TB or larger Fusion Drive or all-SSD storage.”
NOTE: Apple’s marketing materials now define a terabyte as one trillion bytes. This means that when a disk is formatted, its storage capacity will be less than 1 TB because of the differences between how marketing and engineering calculate disk sizes.
WHICH GPU?
Configuring the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) is now done when you pick the initial iMac, rather than as a build-to-order option within each iMac family. So, much though I would like to pick the mid-range system and add a high-end GPU into it, we no longer have that option.
Which is a shame. Because while we don’t need the high-end CPU system for most video editing, we would significantly benefit from the high-end 580 GPU in any system.
Both Final Cut and Premiere are increasingly using the GPU for most editing tasks, because the GPU is much faster than the CPU at rendering bitmapped images. Therefore, the best choice is the high-end GPU. The high-end GPU also includes 8 GB of video memory (VRAM).
However, the mid-range system with the Radeon Pro 575X is a perfectly adequate choice.
NOTE: The difference between the 575X and 580X is performance. The 575X has a peak performance of about 4.5 Teraflops, while the 580X supports up to 5.5 Tflops. Both will handle video just fine. All of the Radeon chips support OpenCL and Apple’s Metal and up-coming Metal 2 GPU computing API.
Here’s a link to learn more about Radeon’s GPU chips.
NOTE: Again, if you are principally doing video compression, the GPU speed is less important than the CPU speed. So, compressionists don’t need as high-performance a GPU as an editor.
UPDATE: When looking at GPU performance, use the specs for Metal or Metal II. OpenCL will not be supported going forward. Also, while eGPUs are attractive, I don’t see them, yet, as a big enough benefit for iMacs. eGPUs are principally designed for laptops.
HOW MUCH RAM?
Both Final Cut and Premiere will use as much RAM as you can afford.
Based on my tests with the 2016 MacBook Pro, I recommend a minimum of 16 GB of RAM, though, all my systems here have 32 GB. Again, if you have the money, max out the RAM. However, 32 GB of RAM will be sufficient for virtually all projects.

HOW MUCH SHOULD I SPEND?
You are going to be using this computer for four years. Spend what you can afford, but don’t be stingy in areas that matter: GPU and RAM.
All the base systems are fine, But, depending upon your needs, you can tweak the configurations to better match what you want the systems to do. All systems feature wireless mice and keyboards; though, in my office, I prefer my mice and keyboards wired.
NOTE: Apple has not yet delivered the Touch Bar on any stand-alone keyboards.
If it were my money and I was doing video editing on a budget, here’s what I would get:
Total: $2,499 (you’ll still need to spend additional money for 3rd-party RAM)
However, I wish that Apple made the Radeon 580X available on the mid-range unit.
If it were my money and I was doing mostly video compression, I’d get the high-end Mac mini. (This, in fact, is what I did personally.) Here’s an article that explains this in more detail.
As always, I’m interested in your opinions.
2,000 Video Training Titles
Edit smarter with Larry Jordan. Available in our store.
Access over 2,000 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!
Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and
save 10%
on your first purchase.
346 Responses to Configure a 2019 iMac for Video Editing [u]
← Older Comments Newer Comments →-
Jason Kohnke says:
March 25, 2019 at 9:45 am
-
Larry says:
March 25, 2019 at 10:34 am
-
Claudia says:
March 26, 2019 at 5:34 am
-
Larry says:
March 26, 2019 at 11:33 am
-
horea says:
March 28, 2019 at 1:45 am
-
Larry says:
March 28, 2019 at 7:44 am
-
Lisa says:
March 28, 2019 at 12:16 pm
-
Larry says:
March 28, 2019 at 3:18 pm
-
Tyler M Penor says:
March 29, 2019 at 1:53 pm
-
Larry says:
March 29, 2019 at 6:38 pm
← Older Comments Newer Comments →Hey Larry. I have a:
(Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017
4.2 GHz Intel Core i7
32 GB 2400 MHz DDR4
Radeon Pro 580 8192 MB
I am not impressed at all with the sluggishness I have when editing in PP & AE. I have been thinking of purchasing the Blackmagic GPU all-in -one. Will that speed things up exponentially? Thanks for everything you do!
Jason:
No. The Blackmagic eGPU has the same GPU as your iMac. Maybe using an OWC eGPU, where you can substitute a different GPU would be better.
What I would do is hold your frustrations until you see what Adobe announces at NAB – they always update their software then and, perhaps, they’ll have something that improves performance.
An eGPU is a good option, but you need to be SURE that it supports a significantly faster GPU than the one in your iMac. The Blackmagic device is designed for laptops, not iMacs.
Larry
Hi Larry! My chance is to buy a:
Imac Retina 5K, 27-inch
3.8 GHz Intel Core i5
32 GB 2400 MHz DDR4
Radeon Pro 580 8192 MB
2TB Fusion Drive
Mainly the work is based in HD and 4K projects, which I edit in Premiere. I´m planning to color grade in Resolve. Do you think this machine will be ok? Thanks!
Claudia:
You should be fine.
Larry
hi Larry
we met at you first ever presentation of the new FCP X at Apple store in SF. irrelevant for this:
i intend to purchase in the next 24-48 hours a new iMac. The largest “regular” one.
Imac Retina 5K, 27-inch
3.8 GHz Intel Core i5
8 GB 2400 MHz DDR4 – that i will upgrade to 16
Radeon Pro 580 8192 MB
2TB Fusion Drive
and
Final Cut X
my question is – is it necessary to upgrade the
CPU to the icore9 Turbo Boost up to 5.0GHz
graphic card to Vega?
i edit video, experimental, essay, doc just for myself – have all the time
import old footage from miniDv directly or stretched to HD.
lots of Photoshop files at HD size and text also in Photoshop at HD size
some effects, not obsessive about tricks
the budget/ price will be on a 18 month interest free card, but still like 3,600 dollars – for me a lot
Thank you!
and if you suggest ONE of the cards which onewould be the priority? CPU or GPU
Horea:
For your needs this is more than fine. It is an excellent choice.
The nice thing is that you can upgrade RAM should your photoshop files require more. Again, given your needs, I don’t see a reason to update either the CPU or GPU.
Larry
Hello from Germany Larry!
First of all, thank you for this informative article.
I’d like to ask you a question:
I’ve had an iMac since 2012. It is agonizing slow. Time to get a new one.
But I can’t really make my mind up about which one I’ll get.
I don’t own a TV, so my iMac is also functioning for that.
I have the 21 inch at the moment. Been happy with the size so far.
I’m an actress so I need to use my imac to edit large files from shortmovies, movies .. for my show reel
and I’m also editing a lot of videos in Final Cut. (Fun Videos with friends)
But the video files for the hobby videos are most of the times coming from my iphone, so they’re not super large.
I don’t really have that much money, but would like to purchase an iMac which will be functioning for a few years and which will also be fast when I’m editing stuff in Final Cut.
Is your final conclusion accurate and fitting my situation ?
(Sorry for asking you this, but I want to be a 100 percent sure)
27″ Retina 5K Display
3.6GHz 8-core 9th-generation Intel Core i9 processor, Turbo Boost up to 5.0GHz
(Includes the Radeon 575X GPU)
8 GB of RAM (buy a 32 GB RAM upgrade from a 3rd party)
1 TB Fusion drive
Thank you ! 🙂
Lisa:
Thanks for writing.
Given your description, you don’t need the highest-performance CPU. You could step down one step, get the mid-range i5, and still have a totally acceptable system, for less money. You are not deadline driven, so you can easily work with a slightly slower CPU.
I have found iMacs to be especially durable. In my small office, I have a 2013, 2014, and 2017 iMac – all happily working on Sierra, High Sierra and Mojave with no problems.
I am a fan of Fusion drives – a nice balance between speed and capacity. The only thing you might budget for is more external storage – and, remember, a new iMac uses Thunderbolt 3 for ports.
Larry
Thanks for this. I am looking into getting one of the new 2019 imacs I edit videos and photos using the adobe sweet (lightroom/photoshop/premiere/aftereffects and shoot alot of 4k content. Would love a reccomendation for the set up that would work and I would like this to be my main editing computer that can last into the future so i don’t mind spending a bit more. (trying to stay between $3000 and $4000
Tyler:
Thanks for writing. Given your description, I would recommend the system featured at the end of this article.
Larry