[ Update: On March 19, 2019, Apple released updates to both 21.5″ and 27″ iMacs. These new systems feature improved CPU and GPU options, though the display and storage remain the same as earlier versions. I’ve reflected these new options in my recommendations below. ]
At their WWDC, in June, 2017, Apple announced and released new iMac computers, designed to meet the needs of professionals. These new systems sport a variety of very exciting features. However, if you are on a budget, how do you determine where to spend your money?
This article is designed to help you make more informed choices when you don’t have a lot of money to spend.
NOTE: I have not purchased any of these systems. My recommendations are based on past experience, current system specs and talking with informed individuals.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
If money is no object, buy the top of the line iMac. It will work great and you’ll have bragging rights over all the other systems.
But, if money IS an object, then you need to make trade-offs, balancing the performance you need with the money you have. However, you don’t need to spend a fortune to get a system today that can meet your editing needs for the next several years.
ALSO: Here are two other configuration articles you may find useful:
YES, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE IMAC PRO?

Holy smokes! What a system.
This review covers the iMac. Click here to read about the iMac Pro.
YES, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE MAC PRO?
Given the latest iMac releases, there are very, very few reasons to purchase a Mac Pro right now; especially given its price. Keep in mind, however, that Apple has already announced they are working on a new, top-of-the-line Mac Pro which will ship sometime in 2019.
Given what Apple has announced for the iMac Pro, however, that upcoming Mac Pro will need to be a true screamer to compete. I’m looking forward to seeing what Apple creates – but, as I mentioned earlier, I still need to pay my bills today.
And that leads us directly to the latest updates to the iMac.
WHAT SIZE SCREEN?

Both Final Cut Pro X and Premiere interfaces work best on larger screens. This is not to say they work poorly on smaller screens, but both of these display a LOT of elements on screen. More screen room is MUCH better.
I recommend a 27″ display. Plus, all the new 27″ iMacs now share the same 5K Retina Display.
NOTE: One of my iMacs is an older 5K iMac. I’ve discovered, that while seeing a 5K image is nice, the on-screen text is often very hard to read. So I’ve lowered the screen resolution using System Preferences to make the text larger. I prefer to easily read the text to seeing every pixel in my image.
However, if the purpose of the new system is video compression, you don’t need the bigger screen size. In which case, you can save money and improve performance with a 21″ system.
NOTE: Both H.264 and the up-coming H.265 video codecs are hardware-accelerated in all the new hardware. While this won’t help when transcoding into ProRes, hardware-acceleration will significantly speed compressing files for the web.
WHAT SPEED CPU?
UPDATE Intel’s latest 8th-gen and 9th-gen Core processors, including up to a 3.2GHz six-core 8th-gen Core i7 with Turbo Boost up to 4.6GHz for the 21.5-inch 4K iMac and up to a 3.6GHz eight-core 9th-gen Core i9 with Turbo Boost up to 5.0GHz for the 27-inch 5K iMac.
While CPU speed is important, it is not critical for video editing; remember, iMacs that were current as recently as last month, were easily able to edit almost all forms of SD, HD, and 4K media.
Any of the processors in any of the new iMacs will be fine for video or audio editing.
UPDATE: The choice in the 21.5″ iMac is between i5 and i7. The i7 is worth the money because of its support for multi-threading. The choice in the 27″ iMac is harder: between i5 and i9, because it’s a $500 differential. Unlike the i5, the i9 supports multithreading. If you are doing multicam, 4K or HDR editing, or lots of video compression, the i9 is worth the money.
HOW MUCH STORAGE?

I really like that Apple has put Fusion drives into all but two of their iMacs. I own two iMacs with Fusion drives and I remain very impressed with these systems. They are an excellent balance between the speed of an SSD with the storage capacity of spinning media.
Keep in mind that the SSD portion of a Fusion drive is only a part of the total storage. For example, the 1 TB Fusion uses a 32 GB SSD, while the 2 and 3 TB Fusion drives use a 128 GB SSD. The OS watches what you do and moves files onto the SSD based upon what you are using most. Which means that a Fusion drive works fastest with files you access over and over.
NOTE: Here is an updated article on storage speeds and media requirements that explains the load your storage system needs to carry.
If you want maximum performance AND you plan to store media on an external drive, get the 512 GB SSD. All the files in macOS will take less than 30 GB, leaving plenty of room for working files and immediate storage.
If you want an excellent balance between performance, price and capacity, stay with the 1 TB Fusion drive. Again, store media externally.
If you don’t plan to purchase external storage – and you will, you just don’t know it yet – get the 3 TB Fusion drive. (An extra TB for $100 makes this a better value than the 2 TB Fusion drive.)
One of my systems has a 3 TB Fusion drive. Currently, I’m using 600 GB of it. The rest is sitting around idle. When using external storage, you really don’t need lots of internal storage.
If you just want maximum performance from your storage, get the 1 TB SSD. It’s pricey, but it’s speed will make you giggle.
Apple notes: “For the best performance, iMac systems with 32GB or more of memory should be configured with a 2TB or larger Fusion Drive or all-SSD storage.”
NOTE: Apple’s marketing materials now define a terabyte as one trillion bytes. This means that when a disk is formatted, its storage capacity will be less than 1 TB because of the differences between how marketing and engineering calculate disk sizes.
WHICH GPU?
Configuring the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) is now done when you pick the initial iMac, rather than as a build-to-order option within each iMac family. So, much though I would like to pick the mid-range system and add a high-end GPU into it, we no longer have that option.
Which is a shame. Because while we don’t need the high-end CPU system for most video editing, we would significantly benefit from the high-end 580 GPU in any system.
Both Final Cut and Premiere are increasingly using the GPU for most editing tasks, because the GPU is much faster than the CPU at rendering bitmapped images. Therefore, the best choice is the high-end GPU. The high-end GPU also includes 8 GB of video memory (VRAM).
However, the mid-range system with the Radeon Pro 575X is a perfectly adequate choice.
NOTE: The difference between the 575X and 580X is performance. The 575X has a peak performance of about 4.5 Teraflops, while the 580X supports up to 5.5 Tflops. Both will handle video just fine. All of the Radeon chips support OpenCL and Apple’s Metal and up-coming Metal 2 GPU computing API.
Here’s a link to learn more about Radeon’s GPU chips.
NOTE: Again, if you are principally doing video compression, the GPU speed is less important than the CPU speed. So, compressionists don’t need as high-performance a GPU as an editor.
UPDATE: When looking at GPU performance, use the specs for Metal or Metal II. OpenCL will not be supported going forward. Also, while eGPUs are attractive, I don’t see them, yet, as a big enough benefit for iMacs. eGPUs are principally designed for laptops.
HOW MUCH RAM?
Both Final Cut and Premiere will use as much RAM as you can afford.
Based on my tests with the 2016 MacBook Pro, I recommend a minimum of 16 GB of RAM, though, all my systems here have 32 GB. Again, if you have the money, max out the RAM. However, 32 GB of RAM will be sufficient for virtually all projects.

HOW MUCH SHOULD I SPEND?
You are going to be using this computer for four years. Spend what you can afford, but don’t be stingy in areas that matter: GPU and RAM.
All the base systems are fine, But, depending upon your needs, you can tweak the configurations to better match what you want the systems to do. All systems feature wireless mice and keyboards; though, in my office, I prefer my mice and keyboards wired.
NOTE: Apple has not yet delivered the Touch Bar on any stand-alone keyboards.
If it were my money and I was doing video editing on a budget, here’s what I would get:
Total: $2,499 (you’ll still need to spend additional money for 3rd-party RAM)
However, I wish that Apple made the Radeon 580X available on the mid-range unit.
If it were my money and I was doing mostly video compression, I’d get the high-end Mac mini. (This, in fact, is what I did personally.) Here’s an article that explains this in more detail.
As always, I’m interested in your opinions.
2,000 Video Training Titles
Edit smarter with Larry Jordan. Available in our store.
Access over 2,000 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!
Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and
save 10%
on your first purchase.
346 Responses to Configure a 2019 iMac for Video Editing [u]
← Older Comments Newer Comments →-
BPR says:
February 26, 2019 at 7:36 am
-
John says:
February 27, 2019 at 6:22 am
-
Larry says:
February 27, 2019 at 6:33 am
-
Larry says:
February 27, 2019 at 6:39 am
-
Vincent says:
February 28, 2019 at 12:34 am
-
Larry says:
February 28, 2019 at 8:10 pm
-
Hector says:
March 2, 2019 at 1:53 pm
-
Larry says:
March 2, 2019 at 4:32 pm
-
John says:
March 3, 2019 at 7:42 am
-
Larry says:
March 3, 2019 at 10:19 am
← Older Comments Newer Comments →I am considering a Radeon 570 with 4GB vs the 8GB version…how much of a difference, if any, does the difference in VRAM make for video editing? I am able to pick up the 4GB on sale for about 40% less of what the 8GB goes for. Trying to decide whether the cost/performance ratio is worth it. Thanks.
Larry:
Vincent’s predicament is pretty much mine too. I was looking at the same configuration that he was. I typically edit to and from an external drive with FW800. Right now I’m editing with a 2009 IMAC 2.7 GHTZ 4GB memory 10.9.5. I’m finally going to take the subscription leap to Premiere soon. Still hanging on to FCP-7.
I do about 70% of my own editing. I usually have my editor do the finishing. Which means he has to switch back over to his old FCP-7 system to work on my material. I’m not editing every day, but I have upcoming projects which involve some 4k and 6k RED.
Question: Can I work with the configuration Larry mentions if I’m working off external drives using Thunderbolt-3 combined with accessing some material from FW800 drives? My editor says I should go the new Mac Mini route with a decent monitor. Can I get away with the 3.6ghz quad core or should I go with the 3.0 ghz 6 core? I have a budget of around 2K. The Mac Mini route seems like the way to go, but I don’t know its limitations. This will be my full time computer too.
Thanks,
John
BPR:
Increasing VRAM does not increase quality, just speed. If you are editing HD, you probably won’t the difference.
If you are editing 4K or larger frame sizes and not adding significant effects, you won’t notice it.
Where it will make a difference – but how much varies by shot, codec and effect – is large frame sizes, with heavy color correction, shooting RAW or HDR.
Larry
John:
If you are editing 4K or 6K, your Firewire drive is WOEFULLY!! inadequate. It delivers speeds up to about 85 MB/second. 4K/6K files require above 400 MB/second.
If you really are looking to larger frame sizes, you will need to spend the money to support them both in storage and CPU horsepower. The Mac mini is fine for editing – even 4k – but with an underpowered GPU. If you are creating lots of video with After Effects or Motion – both of which use the GPU – the Mac mini will need an eGPU for extra horsepower.
So, in short: If you are editing HD, your system is OK, but you are making your editor’s life difficult by running older software. Premiere is a comfortable choice after FCP 7. If you move to 4K, you need a new system and new storage. Thunderbolt 2 or e will both work – and Thunderbolt is optimized for media. In any case, between getting the high-performance Mac Mini ($1500), a better monitor and more storage, you’ll exceed your $2K budget.
Larry
Good to know all this Larry. How do you edit your 4K? At this point I am thinking of building a PC with nearly 3 tb of SSD to handle this endeavor.
I really don’t wanna switch but I feel like I have no choice thanks to Apples hesitation releasing the new iMac. I just want to make a smart investment.
Vincent:
If you need something immediately, an iMac Pro can easily handle 4K, and with up to 28 cores, has power to burn. You can also add a 2 TB SSD.
However, I suspect we will learn Apple’s plans for a new Mac Pro in much more detail at the WWDC keynote in early June. Developers are precisely the right audience to showcase a top of the line Mac system. While I don’t KNOW anything, for sure, this was the audience that Apple traditionally showcases all their high-end gear.
Rather than rush into switching platforms wait until June, then you can make a more informed decision.
Larry
I’m looking into getting a new iMac. This article was extremely helpful. In my current situation, I’m using a mid 2011 iMac with a 3.1 GHz Intel i5, 12 GB of RAM, and a AMD Radeon HD 6970M GPU with 1 GB of RAM. And you know what? The machine works pretty darn well for a computer that old. Sure, it’s a wee bit slow, but absolutely nothing atrocious that is unusable.
I import 4k footage fine, convert it to proxy, do all my editing and coloring, and exports flawlessly. No issues at all. The only times I have issues is when I’m using original or optimized footage, or doing heavy graphics and effects, then it runs a little slow.
But…I think it’s time to upgrade. I want faster.
I’m stuck right now just waiting and hoping that SOMETHING will be announced soon about a new iMac. I’m a little hesitant purchasing a “new” computer that is already a year and half old. I’m asking all of your opinions if it would be wise to get a top tier 2017 iMac with upgraded CPU (just because I can afford it right now), or just wait for some sort of announcement.
Hector:
If you don’t need to buy now, I would wait. The WWDC (Worldwide Developers Conference) is coming in early June. This is where Apple traditionally announces its new, high-end gear. If you need something RIGHT NOW, the 27″ iMac or iMac Pro are excellent machines. I recommend them. However, if you can wait a couple of months, you’ll have more choices.
And, relax. Apple is ALWAYS working on new stuff. Always. While we don’t know when it will be announced, nor what, specifically, it will be, Apple has enhanced the Mac every year since it first began. That trend will continue.
Larry
Could you advise on external hard drive sets up? For iMac 21.5- maxed out 2017.
Should I use an SSD for proxy editing? And other questions. ?
John:
There’s no one simple answer to your question. (Here’s a collection of articles providing a basic foundation for understanding storage.)
In general:
* I advise storing media on external storage because it is easier to move from computer to computer, or add more storage as needed.
* SSDs are best when you need the greatest speed. (Proxies are designed for spinning media.)
* Spinning media hard disks are best when you need the greatest storage capacity
* RAIDS are a good compromise between the speed of SSD and the capacity of spinning media
* Spinning media hard drives cost less per terabyte than SSDs
* SD media can easily be editing using a single attached hard drive
* HD media can easily be editing using a small RAID or attached SSD
* 4K and greater media needs a large RAID of spinning media – or – small RAID of SSDs – or – the new NVME data standard
Like I said, there’s no single answer that works for everyone. You are always balancing budget – speed – and capacity. Generally, you can optimize two of the three.
Larry