Configure a 2019 iMac for Video Editing [u]

Posted on by Larry

[ Update: On March 19, 2019, Apple released updates to both 21.5″ and 27″ iMacs. These new systems feature improved CPU and GPU options, though the display and storage remain the same as earlier versions. I’ve reflected these new options in my recommendations below. ]

At their WWDC, in June, 2017, Apple announced and released new iMac computers, designed to meet the needs of professionals. These new systems sport a variety of very exciting features. However, if you are on a budget, how do you determine where to spend your money?

This article is designed to help you make more informed choices when you don’t have a lot of money to spend.

NOTE: I have not purchased any of these systems. My recommendations are based on past experience, current system specs and talking with informed individuals.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

If money is no object, buy the top of the line iMac. It will work great and you’ll have bragging rights over all the other systems.

But, if money IS an object, then you need to make trade-offs, balancing the performance you need with the money you have. However, you don’t need to spend a fortune to get a system today that can meet your editing needs for the next several years.

ALSO: Here are two other configuration articles you may find useful:

YES, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE IMAC PRO?

Holy smokes! What a system.

This review covers the iMac. Click here to read about the iMac Pro.

YES, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE MAC PRO?

Given the latest iMac releases, there are very, very few reasons to purchase a Mac Pro right now; especially given its price. Keep in mind, however, that Apple has already announced they are working on a new, top-of-the-line Mac Pro which will ship sometime in 2019.

Given what Apple has announced for the iMac Pro, however, that upcoming Mac Pro will need to be a true screamer to compete. I’m looking forward to seeing what Apple creates – but, as I mentioned earlier, I still need to pay my bills today.

And that leads us directly to the latest updates to the iMac.

WHAT SIZE SCREEN?

Both Final Cut Pro X and Premiere interfaces work best on larger screens. This is not to say they work poorly on smaller screens, but both of these display a LOT of elements on screen. More screen room is MUCH better.

I recommend a 27″ display. Plus, all the new 27″ iMacs now share the same 5K Retina Display.

NOTE: One of my iMacs is an older 5K iMac. I’ve discovered, that while seeing a 5K image is nice, the on-screen text is often very hard to read. So I’ve lowered the screen resolution using System Preferences to make the text larger. I prefer to easily read the text to seeing every pixel in my image.

However, if the purpose of the new system is video compression, you don’t need the bigger screen size. In which case, you can save money and improve performance with a 21″ system.

NOTE: Both H.264 and the up-coming H.265 video codecs are hardware-accelerated in all the new hardware. While this won’t help when transcoding into ProRes, hardware-acceleration will significantly speed compressing files for the web.

WHAT SPEED CPU?

UPDATE Intel’s latest 8th-gen and 9th-gen Core processors, including up to a 3.2GHz six-core 8th-gen Core i7 with Turbo Boost up to 4.6GHz for the 21.5-inch 4K iMac and up to a 3.6GHz eight-core 9th-gen Core i9 with Turbo Boost up to 5.0GHz for the 27-inch 5K iMac.

While CPU speed is important, it is not critical for video editing; remember, iMacs that were current as recently as last month, were easily able to edit almost all forms of SD, HD, and 4K media.

Any of the processors in any of the new iMacs will be fine for video or audio editing.

UPDATE: The choice in the 21.5″ iMac is between i5 and i7. The i7 is worth the money because of its support for multi-threading. The choice in the 27″ iMac is harder: between i5 and i9, because it’s a $500 differential. Unlike the i5, the i9 supports multithreading. If you are doing multicam, 4K or HDR editing, or lots of video compression, the i9 is worth the money.

HOW MUCH STORAGE?

I really like that Apple has put Fusion drives into all but two of their iMacs. I own two iMacs with Fusion drives and I remain very impressed with these systems. They are an excellent balance between the speed of an SSD with the storage capacity of spinning media.

Keep in mind that the SSD portion of a Fusion drive is only a part of the total storage. For example, the 1 TB Fusion uses a 32 GB SSD, while the 2 and 3 TB Fusion drives use a 128 GB SSD. The OS watches what you do and moves files onto the SSD based upon what you are using most. Which means that a Fusion drive works fastest with files you access over and over.

NOTE: Here is an updated article on storage speeds and media requirements that explains the load your storage system needs to carry.

If you want maximum performance AND you plan to store media on an external drive, get the 512 GB SSD. All the files in macOS will take less than 30 GB, leaving plenty of room for working files and immediate storage.

If you want an excellent balance between performance, price and capacity, stay with the 1 TB Fusion drive. Again, store media externally.

If you don’t plan to purchase external storage – and you will, you just don’t know it yet – get the 3 TB Fusion drive. (An extra TB for $100 makes this a better value than the 2 TB Fusion drive.)

One of my systems has a 3 TB Fusion drive. Currently, I’m using 600 GB of it. The rest is sitting around idle. When using external storage, you really don’t need lots of internal storage.

If you just want maximum performance from your storage, get the 1 TB SSD. It’s pricey, but it’s speed will make you giggle.

Apple notes: “For the best performance, iMac systems with 32GB or more of memory should be configured with a 2TB or larger Fusion Drive or all-SSD storage.”

NOTE: Apple’s marketing materials now define a terabyte as one trillion bytes. This means that when a disk is formatted, its storage capacity will be less than 1 TB because of the differences between how marketing and engineering calculate disk sizes.

WHICH GPU?

Configuring the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) is now done when you pick the initial iMac, rather than as a build-to-order option within each iMac family. So, much though I would like to pick the mid-range system and add a high-end GPU into it, we no longer have that option.

Which is a shame. Because while we don’t need the high-end CPU system for most video editing, we would significantly benefit from the high-end 580 GPU in any system.

Both Final Cut and Premiere are increasingly using the GPU for most editing tasks, because the GPU is much faster than the CPU at rendering bitmapped images. Therefore, the best choice is the high-end GPU. The high-end GPU also includes 8 GB of video memory (VRAM).

However, the mid-range system with the Radeon Pro 575X is a perfectly adequate choice.

NOTE: The difference between the 575X and 580X is performance. The 575X has a peak performance of about 4.5 Teraflops, while the 580X supports up to 5.5 Tflops. Both will handle video just fine. All of the Radeon chips support OpenCL and Apple’s Metal and up-coming Metal 2 GPU computing API.

Here’s a link to learn more about Radeon’s GPU chips.

NOTE: Again, if you are principally doing video compression, the GPU speed is less important than the CPU speed. So, compressionists don’t need as high-performance a GPU as an editor.

UPDATE: When looking at GPU performance, use the specs for Metal or Metal II. OpenCL will not be supported going forward. Also, while eGPUs are attractive, I don’t see them, yet, as a big enough benefit for iMacs. eGPUs are principally designed for laptops.

HOW MUCH RAM?

Both Final Cut and Premiere will use as much RAM as you can afford.

Based on my tests with the 2016 MacBook Pro, I recommend a minimum of 16 GB of RAM, though, all my systems here have 32 GB. Again, if you have the money, max out the RAM. However, 32 GB of RAM will be sufficient for virtually all projects.

HOW MUCH SHOULD I SPEND?

You are going to be using this computer for four years. Spend what you can afford, but don’t be stingy in areas that matter: GPU and RAM.

All the base systems are fine, But, depending upon your needs, you can tweak the configurations to better match what you want the systems to do. All systems feature wireless mice and keyboards; though, in my office, I prefer my mice and keyboards wired.

NOTE: Apple has not yet delivered the Touch Bar on any stand-alone keyboards.

If it were my money and I was doing video editing on a budget, here’s what I would get:

Total: $2,499 (you’ll still need to spend additional money for 3rd-party RAM)

However, I wish that Apple made the Radeon 580X available on the mid-range unit.

If it were my money and I was doing mostly video compression, I’d get the high-end Mac mini. (This, in fact, is what I did personally.) Here’s an article that explains this in more detail.

As always, I’m interested in your opinions.


Bookmark the permalink.

346 Responses to Configure a 2019 iMac for Video Editing [u]

← Older Comments Newer Comments →
  1. Larry says:

    Lloyd:

    Well, maybe. It depends upon what you are doing – and your definition of “highly.” For HD editing in Premiere, both systems are excellent. For images larger than 4K or HDR, the 2015 will work harder than the 2017 version.

    There’s no advantage to the 2017 version unless you also upgrade to the high-end GPU. Otherwise, I don’t think the difference is big enough to justify the cost.

    If you make a living as an editor, get the 2017 version with enhanced GPU. If editing is a hobby – even a serious hobby – the 2015 version with extra RAM as you indicate – will be a solid choice.

    Larry

  2. K. Guru says:

    Hi Larry,

    We would like your advice on this. We have C300 and now acquired Canon C200 mainly for 4K shoot and edit, All the MBPs and iMacs were of 2011, but maxed to SSD & RAM. These system were all fine until we faced 4K RAW workflow, and we know that major upgrade is must now. however we are bit perplexed, to chose between (A) iMac latest27 “, i5, 32 Gb, 3.5Ghz, Radeon 580 & (B) base level iMac Pro 27” 8 core. the iMac pro is double the cost. we want to have future proof system say min 5 years from now, which can handle the workflow like of Canon C200 4K RAW @ 12 bit, 1 Gbps, HDR and FCPX. shall we first buy the (A) to start with and later add (B) option ? or better go for (B) iMac pro straight way although its costs double? your opinion will be a great help for us. Regards K. Guru

  3. Larry says:

    K. Guru:

    I don’t think anyone can realistically predict what gear will be “future proof” for the next five years. If you continue to edit exactly the same formats and frames for the next five years, your computer will easily last that long.

    However, if we know anything, we know that frame rates are continuing to increase, resolution and frame size continues to increase and bit depth will definitely increase as we move more aggressively into HDR and RAW media. So, your future-proof expectations need to be tempered by an understanding that it is impossible to predict the media formats that you’ll be making money on five years out.

    Second, storage capacity and bandwidth are even more important than the speed of your computer. Many people focus on the computer, when they SHOULD focus on their storage. You will not be able to edit any significant media using the internal storage of your computer. This means that the speed of your storage will determine, in large part, the speed of your computer.

    Another determinant is what NLE you use for editing. Final Cut Pro X is optimized for the iMac Pro, Premiere is not; yet. Once Premiere is optimized for the iMac Pro, given what you want to do, the iMac Pro 10-core with 32 GB of RAM and top of the line GPU is the ideal choice. However, if your budget can’t afford that, the 27″ iMac with 32 GB of RAM and top-of-the-line GPU is an excellent second choice.

    If a major part of your work involved video compression, the 27″ iMac will be a better choice. If the major part of your work is editing 4K / RAW media the iMac Pro is a better, but more expensive, choice.

    There’s no perfect answer, it all depends on the media you are editing, the software you are editing it with and the speed of your storage.

    Larry

  4. Lloyd Lemmermann says:

    Thanks this is very helpful. I foresee more client editing work over the next couple of years, so the 2017 with upgraded GPU makes sense. Best regards.

  5. Jonathan Keys says:

    Hi Larry what external drive would you recommend for 4K editing on a 2017 iMac

  6. Larry says:

    Jonathan:

    4K, HDR and VR all require drives with significant speed AND capacity. While a single SSD drive has plenty of speed, it doesn’t have a lot of capacity. For this reason, I recommend at least a 4-drive RAID. If you are shooting and editing native RAW files, an 8-drive RAID would be better.

    Consider products from these vendors:

    * G-Technology – http://www.g-tech.com
    * OWC – http://www.owcdigital.com
    * Promise – http://www.promise.com
    * LaCie – http://www.lacie.com

    Larry

  7. Rohan Jain says:

    I’m starting to get into light 4k editing with premiere and fcpx. I also do quite a bit of photoshop and web design If I get the base model 27 but 24gb of ram should I be ok

  8. Larry says:

    Rohan:

    24 GB of RAM should be fine.

    Larry

  9. Oguz Uygur says:

    Larry, thank you for this article! Your generosity with your time is invaluable for a lot of editors like me. I do have a question about older iMacs vs newer. There is a 2014 27″ iMac available for sale with specs:

    – 4.0GHz Intel Core i7
    – 32GB
    – 1TB SSD
    – AMD Radeon R9 M285X 4GB

    Would you buy this machine for $2000 or buy the new machine you recommended on this article? And why?

    Thank you.

  10. Larry says:

    Oguz:

    This question is impossible to answer in the abstract, it all depends upon what type of video you are editing

    * SD? Not a problem.
    * HD? Probably not a problem
    * Multicam? Probably not a problem
    * 4K? Not sufficient
    * HDR? Not sufficient
    * Heavy effects work? Not sufficient

    You get the idea – lots of choices here. Also, be SURE that you budget for a second hard drive and, preferably a RAID. You’ll need lots of storage – more than the 1 TB SSD – for your system.

    Larry

← Older Comments Newer Comments →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything You Need to Know


2,000 Video Training Titles

  • Apple Final Cut Pro
  • Adobe Premiere Pro
  • DaVinci Resolve

Edit smarter with Larry Jordan. Available in our store.

Access over 2,000 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!


JOIN NOW

Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and
save 10%
on your first purchase.