Compressor 4.1: Hardware Acceleration

[NOTE: Starting this week, I have in-depth video training on Compressor 4 available to my Video Training Library subscribers. This title will be released in our store the middle of January. Click here to subscribe.]

One of the new features in Compressor 4.1 is hardware acceleration for some compression tasks. What hardware acceleration does is speed the entire compression process. And, what I’ve learned this week in working with the new Mac Pro, is that by changing a single setting in Compressor 4.1 you can reduce compression times by 75% and, in some cases, reduce compressed file size by half.

It’s called hardware acceleration. Let me show you how this works.


One of the speed advantages of the iMac is that it uses an Intel technology called “QuickSync.” This is a special processor “engine” inside many consumer-grade Intel CPUs that accelerates H.264 compression for certain encoding settings; for example, when compressing for Apple devices, QuickTime or MPEG-4 movies using the H.264 codec. The Mac Pro Xeon CPU is considered “workstation-grade,” and doesn’t provide this hardware acceleration.

Hardware acceleration is a two-edged sword. It is MUCH faster than software encoding. However, it only yields image quality and file sizes equal to single-pass encoding. This will often be fine for movies that don’t contain a lot of movement, such as screen captures; or movies where getting it done fast is better than image quality, such as news or digital dailies. However, hardware compression is generally not the best choice for movies with lots of movement between frames or where you need the highest image quality with the smallest file size.


Hardware acceleration is enabled automatically within Compressor. If your system has the right set of chips, and you select the right compression setting, hardware encoding kicks in.

• Hardware encoding is available on all shipping Macs that use an i5 or i7, Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge processor; except the new Mac Pro.

• Hardware encoding is applied to QuickTime and MPEG-4 compression that uses the H.264 codec; but not to Blu-ray Disc compression.

• Hardware encoding cannot be used for multi-pass encoding. In fact, turning on multi-pass encoding turns off hardware encoding.


Here’s the clip we’ll use for our example. (Footage courtesy: Hallmark Broadcast Ltd. —

This is a two-minute clip, encoded using XDCAM EX, with an original frame size of 1920 x 1080, at 25 fps.

I created a new MPEG-4 compression setting and applied it to the clip.

Here is how I modified the settings:

When I compress the file:


Back in Compressor, all the settings are the same, EXCEPT I turned off Multi-pass. This turns on hardware encoding and single pass compression.


I was fascinated by these results, so I did a couple of other tests, one with a dance clip with lots of movement and one with a screen capture clip with limited movement.

Lots of movement – A dance video

Limited movement – A screen capture movie


I would expect compression speed increases when hardware is involved. What I was not expecting was this much variation in data rates and file sizes. As the amount of movement increases, the data rate differences between the two files start to become equal. However, as the amount of movement decreases, hardware acceleration lowers the data rate which reduces file size, without doing much damage – if any – to the image quality.

NOTE: As I was researching my Compressor 4.1 training, I learned that when a clip has lots of movement, multi-pass encoding becomes the better option. As with all things, test this on your own projects.

The technique is absolutely worth testing on your own projects. The less movement you have between frames, the more you will benefit from hardware acceleration. In fact, I’m using a modification of this setting for my subscription videos. The differences in file size and bandwidth are amazing.

NOTE: As is typical with the H.164 codec in Apple Compressor, I did notice a decrease in chroma levels when using the multi-pass option. You can compensate for this by applying a color correction filter as part of the compression setting.


While this article was written and tested on a new Mac Pro, I learned after the fact that the Mac Pro does not support hardware acceleration. The speed differences illustrated here are the result of the native horsepower of the Mac Pro. However, the iMac and MacBook Pro laptops do support hardware acceleration. This article is accurate in terms of explaining hardware acceleration and when to use it..

Here’s an article I wrote that compares compression speeds between the iMac and Mac Pro, and also tests the differences between hardware acceleration and software encoding.

Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Compressor 4.1: Hardware Acceleration

  1. Tom Fuldner says:


    Thanks for sharing this news about Compressor 4.1. I just did a comparison of hardware/no-hardware on a nine-minute show with “average movement.” Using the “Video Sharing Services, HD1080P” default in Compressor, the hardware/single pass job took 6:18 to complete. The non-hardware/two-pass version is still crunching at 26 minutes at the half-way mark. The hardware/single pass version looks very clean. What a time saver!


  2. Craig Seeman says:

    On hardware acceleration you mention Sandy and Ivy Bridge. Latest consumer processors in Macs are Haswell based though. I thought they have QuickSync as well.

    Given that you can now use High Profile and CABAC entropy but only in single pass encoding, might that improve the quality of the hardware accelerated encodes?
    Granted some older devices might have compatibility issues but they should work fine for web video as well as newer iOS devices.

    In Apple’s doc on Instances it seems they are referring to “virtual” cores. My 4 core i7 devices can all have 1 additional instance (as shown for 8 Cores) and the top list is 24 cores (which would be the 12 core MacPro).

    • Larry Jordan says:


      I don’t know about Haswell chips, my information came from Apple’s website.

      However, I don’t think CABAC entropy is limited to single-pass encoding. I’ve been using it for multi-pass with no error messages – whether it is applied or not, I don’t know.

      You are correct, instances relate to virtual cores.


      • Craig Seeman says:

        I guess one would have to compare an Ivy Bridge to Haswell to determine QuickSync use (hardware acceleration).
        According to Wikipedia (not that we can always trust it) Haswell includes QuickSync support. Of course that doesn’t mean Apple uses it but it is part of the Haswell chipset.

        I don’t think CABAC alone is the “limit” blocking multipass selection. Try using both High Profile and CABAC together. When I use both, multipass encoding option can’t be selected. Please do tell if, when using both, you still have multipass option.

        • Larry Jordan says:


          You are correct – I just checked on the Mac Pro. When BOTH High Profile and CABAC are enabled, we can only do single-pass encoding. I don’t have time at this moment to run a test compression to see how that affects quality.


  3. […] Теги: Final Cut Pro X • Обучение  var […]

  4. Seth Mellman says:


    Thank you for doing all the testing work. Right now almost all of my video (single and multi-cam Sony EX HD) goes to the DVD format. I have been editing on an older Mac Pro (OSX 10.6.8 – 2×2.8 Quad core, FCP7) and using the older Compressor 3.5 at the DVD 90 minute best quality setting (which I believe is VBR 2-pass). I have been very happy with the final image quality.

    I am looking to upgrade my whole system to FCPX, Compressor 4.1 and either an iMac or new Mac Pro. Do you have a recommendation from a compression standpoint between the 2 computers? Thank you.


  5. Dinho Bomfim says:

    Hi, Larry, I have an old iMac C2D 3.06 (early 2009), nVidia GT130, will Compressor 4.1 be faster than 3.5 or 4.0? Is this new version 64bit or not, or doesn’t matter? Thanks!

  6. Al says:

    Would like to see you compare compressor with Adobe’s media encoder. I would buy Compressor standalone if it was considerably faster.

  7. Arn Campero says:

    Do you know if the hardware acceleration with the Intel QuickSync on the i7 works with the MyCometG3 x264 plug in with Compressor 4.1?
    Right now I’ve got a bunch of Mac Pros that run x264 but it would be interesting to see if I could get better performance from either an iMac with hardware acceleration or the new Mac Pro with just multiple instances.

  8. Greg Wilcox says:

    I upgraded to Compressor 4.1.2 and my Blu-Ray disks are now pixelated. I wonder if 4.1.2 is deciding to use hardware compression at all times. I tried multi pass, no multi pass, automatically select bit rate, manually set max bit rate, etc. It just didn’t matter, the 4.1.2 disks were “blocky” in places. The disks were mostly comprised of photographs with almost no movement. The file size for the bad disk was 197 meg and 478 meg for the good disk when both were created with the “multi pass” setting enabled. I run the software on a 27″ 3.5GHz i7 iMac with 16 GB RAM and a 512GB SSD. The only way I could get back to good disks was to restore a Time Machine (Compressor 4.1.1) backup (to another volume) that was taken prior to the upgrades which occurred June 27. Any thoughts?

    • LarryJ says:


      I’m starting to get a number of reports on Blu-ray burning problems.

      Contact Apple Support and see if they have any ideas. Otherwise, have them reflect this on their bug list of things to fix.


  9. […] Source & for further analysis : Compressor 4.1: Hardware Acceleration […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Larry Recommends:

FCPX Complete

NEW & Updated!

Edit smarter with Larry’s latest training, all available in our store.

Access over 1,900 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!


Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and save 10%
on your first purchase.