Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the woocommerce-customer-order-csv-export domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/larry1/lj_dev_site/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the acf domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/larry1/lj_dev_site/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Feeding Video to a Monitor Wall | Larry Jordan

Feeding Video to a Monitor Wall

Posted on by Larry

[ This article was first published in the March, 2009, issue of
Larry’s Final Cut Pro Newsletter. Click here to subscribe. ]

Yoni Goldstein writes:

First of all, thank you for your excellent newsletter. My question is about finding the best strategy for editing multi-channel video. That is, a piece that runs on two or more screens / projections simultaneously (and hopefully, in sync). My method so far has been to shrink each clip to 50% (by copying and pasting attributes) and move everything in V1 to the left of the frame and everything in V2 to the right. Unfortunately, because I use effects. I have to re-render everything and the process is rather slow.

 

Is there a better way to do this? Perhaps using the multiclip view? How do editors build sequences for those 2,3,4 screen displays at trade shows, for example?

Larry replies: The problem with your approach is that you are losing image quality when you shrink your image.

The way a monitor wall works is that you send it a full-screen feed for each camera or image you want it to display. It will then composite them into a single display. This gives you the highest image quality and the ability to zoom one of the images full-screen.

The only disadvantage to this is that you need four separate video sources that you can sync together. Currently, QuickTime only supports playback of one full-screen video image per computer. So you would need multiple computers, or tape decks, or DVD players, or… whatever.

UPDATE – April 2, 2009

Tom Maynor adds:

I recently produced and displayed a 3-screen HD presentation for a trade show.

 

Multiscreener software (free at www.zachpoff.com/site/software/software.html) controls multiple Macs running QuickTime movies and keeps them in sync.

 

As the instructions pointed out I produced three same length videos in FCP and exported Quicktimes in Pro Res 422. I made them native to the display screen size of 1024×768. Running 3 mac pros (1 server and 2 clients) on a simple local network the 3 videos played nonstop for 3 days entirely in sync.

 

Yes, we had to rent the 3 macs in a faraway city but I am finding them more available and affordable and the video looked spectacular!

Larry replies: Tom, very cool! Thanks for letting me know.


Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything You Need to Know


2,000 Video Training Titles

  • Apple Final Cut Pro
  • Adobe Premiere Pro
  • DaVinci Resolve

Edit smarter with Larry Jordan. Available in our store.

Access over 2,000 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!


JOIN NOW

Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and
save 10%
on your first purchase.