How to Configure Video Editing Storage for Maximum Speed or Capacity

[ Updated Nov. 16, 2023, to correct a few errors. ]

Last week, I got into a discussion with Loren Miller about how to configure various storage options for speed. Then, during this week’s webinar, Kathy asked about how to get faster storage without spending a lot of money.

This week’s article looks at both questions.

NOTE: At the end of this article you can download either a PDF or Numbers file so you can modify these numbers yourself.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

RECOMMENDATIONS

THE DETAILS FOR SPINNING (HDD) MEDIA

Let’s start with spinning media. Hard drives transfer data between 100 – 225 MB/second, depending upon age, technology, manufacturer and amount of free space. For this table, I used an average of 175 MB/s.

There are three Thunderbolt protocols in current use:

NOTE: If you download one of the spreadsheets at the end of this article, you can substitute your own numbers to see results more specific to you.

A RAID collects multiple hard drives so that the computer sees them as a single unit. In doing so, it combines both their speed and storage capacity. How a RAID is formatted (called the RAID “Level”) determines ultimate speed and capacity, as illustrated here.

Given that RAID 1 simply mirrors two drives, it makes no sense to configure a RAID with more than two drives as RAID 1.

RAID 5 requires a minimum of 3 drives. RAID 6 and 1+0 require a minimum of four drives. RAID 1+0 also  requires an even number of drives.

THE DETAILS FOR SSDS

NOTE: All SSDs are PCIe. The “PCIe SSDs” listed above should actually say “SATA SSD.”

SSDs are much, MUCH faster than spinning media. But they cost more and hold less. So, it’s a trade-off: blinding speed with limited space.

For technical reasons, SSD RAIDs work best when formatted as RAID Level 4. This allows you to lose one SSD, replace it, then safely restore all your data.

My recommendation, if you need the speed of SSDs is to either create a 4-SSD RAID 4 using SATA SSDs, or buy the largest capacity NVMe SSD you can afford. Both options would completely fill a Thunderbolt 3 or 4 pipe.

UPDATE NOTE: Stand-alone SATA SSDs are increasingly hard to find. Most are replaced by NVMe SSDs.

SUMMARY

Storage provides lots of options for video editors. So many, that trying to decide which works best for you can be really confusing. The key is to understand your workflow. There’s no reason to spend a fortune on high-speed storage if you are only editing HD material.

Performance becomes critical as frames sizes increase or you start editing multicam projects.

EXTRA CREDIT


Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to How to Configure Video Editing Storage for Maximum Speed or Capacity

← Older Comments
  1. Larry says:

    Norris:

    Thanks for your comments. RAID 0 will always be fastest, RAID 5 provides protection in case one drive dies. However, all hard disk systems sometimes need to allow time for repositioning heads, or cooling or other activities that interrupt smooth playback.

    In an ideal world, SSDs are better for video editing. But they are expensive and don’t hold as much as spinning media. However, if you are editing HD material (1080p, for example), I’m surprised you are getting any dropped frames.

    Larry

  2. Norris W Tidwell says:

    I was also surprised but the interruption of the read drops in speed sometimes to 150 mb/sec and that is not enough speed to transfer a frame to the FCP, so a frame is skipped. If the the interruptions occur with very high average speed the interruption does not drop low enough to cause a dropped frame. The best quality and original media settings are the view settings I use with the timeline playback. I don’t get a lot of dropped frames with the Raid 0 setting. Oh, and I use CCC to backup my Libraries. The dropped frames is a problem of the Storage Media type. I have been working with OWC Softraid people to find out why the read has three or four drops in speed over the test period of AJA system speed test. No solution yet!

  3. Larry says:

    Norris:

    Thanks for the follow-up. Let me know what you find out from OWC.

    Larry

  4. I think you are mistaken when saying that Raid 10 sacrifices 50% speed. On a 4 disk array, raid 10 will net 4x read and 2x write versus 2x read and 1x write on raid 5. Simply put, raid penalty is higher on Raid 5, 6. Also, raid 4 is a poor solution as the 1 parity drive will bottleneck your i/o.

    Simply put, Raid 10 if you want performance + redundancy but it comes at a cost. Raid 5 if you want redundancy + maximize storage. Raid 6 for even more redundancy.

  5. Larry says:

    Trent:

    It doesn’t work that way. Speed is determined by the number of drives recording unique data, not the total number of drives. So, in a 4-drive array, RAID 0 records data on 4 unique drives. RAID 1+0 records data on 2 unique drives with the other two drives recording duplicate data.

    Also, RAID 4 is designed for SSD RAIDs, where the data from the parity drive is ignored, minimizing the speed penalty (in theory). RAID 5 is designed for spinning hard drives, maximizing throughput.

    Here’s an article that illustrates the differences in speed between different RAID levels:

    https://larryjordan.com/articles/real-world-speed-results-for-different-raid-levels/

    Larry

  6. Neil Waller says:

    So it seems that the perfect world solution for a small video production company would have 2 solutions: A HDD based, Raid 5 or 6 server for archived footage and projects…
    And either internal drive or an external 2 drive NVME storage (Raid 0) for current projects etc.

  7. Larry Jordan says:

    Neil:

    Yes. More generally: SSD RAID for active projects. HDD RAID for archives. The specific configurations depend upon your situation.

    Larry

  8. Robert Manciero says:

    Very Very good. I have a question for you Larry.
    How do you have your system setup? I know you once mentioned you have an SSD raid for current projects and HD Raid for others.
    I am getting ready to pull the trigger on all new external storage.

  9. Larry Jordan says:

    Robert:

    It all depends upon what you are editing. If all your work is HD, you don’t need as powerful as system as if all your work is 4K multicam.

    My system is:
    * M2 Max Mac Studio
    * OWC ThunderBlade 8TB SSD RAID
    * OWC Thunderbay 4-drive HDD RAID for archiving
    * Synology DS-1522+ network server

    Here are three articles with more detail:

    https://larryjordan.com/articles/how-and-why-to-use-ssds-to-improve-computer-performance/

    https://larryjordan.com/articles/how-to-decide-how-much-computer-performance-you-need-v/

    https://larryjordan.com/articles/interesting-storage-trivia/

    https://larryjordan.com/articles/hey-larry-is-my-computer-fast-enough-for-what-i-want-to-do/

    Larry

  10. Robert Manciero says:

    Thank you very much. You have totally cleared up my confusion. For some reason I couldn’t wrap my brain on how a SSD can work with a HDD but now I understand.
    Once again you are the guru of video.

← Older Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything You Need to Know


2,000 Video Training Titles

  • Apple Final Cut Pro
  • Adobe Premiere Pro
  • DaVinci Resolve

Edit smarter with Larry Jordan. Available in our store.

Access over 2,000 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!


JOIN NOW

Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and
save 10%
on your first purchase.